Skip to main content

When Charlie met Janet.

Topic for Janet when she and Charlie have their mutual admiration meeting:

Please provide a list of all tangible contributions that UC has made to operating LLNL and LANL in the past 25 years. For each one listed clearly indicate how it was specifically unique to the UC.

Other posters welcome to offer suggestions.

Comments

Anonymous said…
No list because no UC contributions in past 25 years.
Anonymous said…
Federalize!
Anonymous said…
Federalize!

August 19, 2017 at 10:51 PM


Which will drop everyone's salary by 40%, not just Charlie.
Anonymous said…


Looks like UC is putting in a bid and Bechtel is out! One other bit of minor good news is that our anti-UC troll will be going absoutly berserk about this.
Anonymous said…
Bechtel will bid with Battelle.
Anonymous said…
Bechtel will bid with Battelle.

August 23, 2017 at 4:24 AM


That could well be the winning team for the next ten years, if they carefully pick their Key Personnel.
Anonymous said…

Bechtel will bid with Battelle.

August 23, 2017 at 4:24 AM

I hear that Battelle is going with UC, and Bechtel is not bidding.
Anonymous said…
I hear that Battelle is going with UC, and Bechtel is not bidding.

August 23, 2017 at 9:12 AM

If you "hear" it, you must be able to tell us who said it. Or you are just hearing things, which is my guess. You should connect with the "rumor has it" guy - you'd have a lot in common. Namely, no facts whatsoever. Maybe you are him?
Anonymous said…
THe RFP will change to 2.5% profit and Bechtel will bid with Battelle. Any takers?

Popular posts from this blog

Plutonium Shots on NIF.

Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises to pursue such stupid ideas as doing Plutonium experiments on NIF. The stupidity arises from the fact that a huge population is placed at risk in the short and long term. Why do this kind of experiment in a heavily populated area? Only a moron would push that kind of imbecile area. Do it somewhere else in the god forsaken hills of Los Alamos. Why should the communities in the Bay Area be subjected to such increased risk just because the lab's NIF has failed twice and is trying the Hail Mary pass of doing an SNM experiment just to justify their existence? Those Laser EoS techniques and the people analyzing the raw data are all just BAD anyways. You know what comes next after they do the experiment. They'll figure out that they need larger samples. More risk for the local population. Stop this imbecilic pursuit. They wan...

Trump is to gut the labs.

The budget has a 20% decrease to DOE office of science, 20% cut to NIH. NASA also gets a cut. This will  have a huge negative effect on the lab. Crazy, juts crazy. He also wants to cut NEA and PBS, this may not seem like  a big deal but they get very little money and do great things.

Why Workplace Jargon Is A Big Problem

From the Huffington Post Why Workplace Jargon Is A Big Problem http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/04/25/work-words_n_5159868.html?utm_hp_ref=business&ir=Business When we replace a specific task with a vague expression, we grant the task more magnitude than it deserves. If we don't describe an activity plainly, it seems less like an easily achievable goal and more like a cloudy state of existence that fills unknowable amounts of time. A fog of fast and empty language has seeped into the workplace. I say it's time we air it out, making room for simple, concrete words, and, therefore, more deliberate actions. By striking the following 26 words from your speech, I think you'll find that you're not quite as overwhelmed as you thought you were. Count the number that LLNLs mangers use.  touch base circle back bandwidth - impactful - utilize - table the discussion deep dive - engagement - viral value-add - one-sheet deliverable - work product - incentivise - take it to the ...