Blog purpose

This BLOG is for LLNL present and past employees, friends of LLNL and anyone impacted by the privatization of the Lab to express their opinions and expose the waste, wrongdoing and any kind of injustice against employees and taxpayers by LLNS/DOE/NNSA. The opinions stated are personal opinions. Therefore, The BLOG author may or may not agree with them before making the decision to post them. Comments not conforming to BLOG rules are deleted. Blog author serves as a moderator. For new topics or suggestions, email jlscoob5@gmail.com

Blog rules

  • Stay on topic.
  • No profanity, threatening language, pornography.
  • NO NAME CALLING.
  • No political debate.
  • Posts and comments are posted several times a day.

Thursday, November 29, 2018

Anthony Rivera whistleblower case, the next phase

Must be logged in to Google to access file .

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B9eIrcyRIQxyWFVMcXRwTURmQ0huMDFCTjV1RkpfUDBfR3Rz/view?usp=drivesdk

1 comment:

Anonymous said...

Mr. Rivera's CA Unemployment Appeals Judge must have found serious discrepancies in the LLNS arguments to proclaim, "...The employer has not sustained its burden to show that the claimant's conduct was willful or wanton under the circumstances and therefore has not shown misconduct. Accordingly, the employer discharged the claimant for reasons other than misconduct..."

Former AD for Engineering Monya Lane and other LLNS senior managers, had to buy into and approve of Mr. Rivera's dismissal ("for reasons other than misconduct"), in order to set his termination in motion. Unlawful workplace harassment has many facets. Unfortunately, there were no "Me Too" or "Time's Up" like large scale movements to protect or defend whistleblowers in 2013 or in the present.

Posts you viewed tbe most last 30 days