Are you saying the FBI could be wrong? I thought we need put our complete trust in the FBI since 2016. Now I am confused.
Just kidding, from reading the title of the story to actually reading the article it is a bit confusing about what is actually going on. I do not know enough about how these cases work to figure if the FBI did anything illegal.
The Hill story looks very very one sided to me. Just reading from reading it does not put anything into context.
WSJ has a more balanced take than Ms Choi here.
Mr. Hu had a 163 page resume, but none of those pages included his multi-year project with the Chinese military in Beijing. I can see how that's suspicious and was investigated. https://www.wsj.com/article...
2 comments:
Are you saying the FBI could be wrong? I thought we need put our complete trust in the FBI since 2016. Now I am confused.
Just kidding, from reading the title of the story to actually reading the article it is a bit confusing about what is actually going on. I do not know enough about how these cases work to figure if the FBI did anything illegal.
The Hill story looks very very one sided to me. Just reading from reading it does not put anything into context.
WSJ has a more balanced take than Ms Choi here.
Mr. Hu had a 163 page resume, but none of those pages included his multi-year project with the Chinese military in Beijing. I can see how that's suspicious and was investigated.
https://www.wsj.com/article...
Post a Comment