From the Huffington Post Why Workplace Jargon Is A Big Problem http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/04/25/work-words_n_5159868.html?utm_hp_ref=business&ir=Business When we replace a specific task with a vague expression, we grant the task more magnitude than it deserves. If we don't describe an activity plainly, it seems less like an easily achievable goal and more like a cloudy state of existence that fills unknowable amounts of time. A fog of fast and empty language has seeped into the workplace. I say it's time we air it out, making room for simple, concrete words, and, therefore, more deliberate actions. By striking the following 26 words from your speech, I think you'll find that you're not quite as overwhelmed as you thought you were. Count the number that LLNLs mangers use. touch base circle back bandwidth - impactful - utilize - table the discussion deep dive - engagement - viral value-add - one-sheet deliverable - work product - incentivise - take it to the ...
Comments
Are you saying the FBI could be wrong? I thought we need put our complete trust in the FBI since 2016. Now I am confused.
Just kidding, from reading the title of the story to actually reading the article it is a bit confusing about what is actually going on. I do not know enough about how these cases work to figure if the FBI did anything illegal.
WSJ has a more balanced take than Ms Choi here.
Mr. Hu had a 163 page resume, but none of those pages included his multi-year project with the Chinese military in Beijing. I can see how that's suspicious and was investigated.
https://www.wsj.com/article...