Skip to main content

LLNL to be Test-Bed for Future NNSA Contracts

Image
By


LLNL to be Test-Bed for Future NNSA Contracts

https://www.defensedaily.com/new-livermore-model-contract-could-help-shape-coming-competition-for-pantex-nnsa-official-says/nuclear-modernization/


Comments

Anonymous said…
Does this signify that NNSA would like to see a money grabbing carpet bagger organization ala Bechtel involved in every contract?
2/16/2023 4:03 PM
Anonymous said…
Why pick on LLNL? There have been plenty of bad privatization models to choose from in the last 25 years. By now, even those entities new to the game, or ones that have been in a coma, realize that any of those kick-the-can-managed-decline compliance models will generate income. And it should be even easier, now that most of those pesky Boomer/X’s are getting out while the getting’s good. With the breathing pulse bearing knowledge base fleeing, the remaining generation can breathe a sigh of relief and will be able to honestly say when they pick up the phone, “I have no idea what you are talking about.”

On the subject of carpet baggers, one must remember who feeds and encourages them. None of this happened by accident. The Department of Energy trajectory has been fairly clear since 1996.
2/17/2023 9:24 AM
Anonymous said…
Hahaha, "reward risk taking", good luck with that. To be a manager now at the labs, the first requirement is that you have to be terrified of your own shadow.
3/02/2023 8:03 PM
Anonymous said…
Bechtel and the other industrial companies in LLNS have destroyed the work environment and work force at LLNL. Issues with sole UC management at LANL was the reason NNSA wanted for profit companies involved in running it, and the thrust that ill conceived approach on LLNL too. Now Bechtel et al are gone from LANL and it’s back to a not for profit public service M&O contractor, while LLNL is still stuck with the Bechtel leeches taking their profits out of LLNL’s hide. Tragic and sad. Having been at LLNL middle management since the mid 90s I can say with certainty the industrial partners in LLNS have added zero good to LLNL’s operations.
3/11/2023 3:45 PM
Anonymous said…
to Anonymous 3/11/23 3:45

Enjoy the new facilities and safety parameters as well as the diversity of thought and people brought to you over the LLNS contract timeframe.
5/02/2023 3:32 PM
Anonymous said…
to Anonymous 3/11/23 3:45

Enjoy the new facilities and safety parameters as well as the diversity of thought and people brought to you over the LLNS contract timeframe.
5/02/2023 3:34 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Plutonium Shots on NIF.

By scooby
Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises to pursue such stupid ideas as doing Plutonium experiments on NIF. The stupidity arises from the fact that a huge population is placed at risk in the short and long term. Why do this kind of experiment in a heavily populated area? Only a moron would push that kind of imbecile area. Do it somewhere else in the god forsaken hills of Los Alamos. Why should the communities in the Bay Area be subjected to such increased risk just because the lab's NIF has failed twice and is trying the Hail Mary pass of doing an SNM experiment just to justify their existence? Those Laser EoS techniques and the people analyzing the raw data are all just BAD anyways. You know what comes next after they do the experiment. They'll figure out that they need larger samples. More risk for the local population. Stop this imbecilic pursuit. They wan...
155 comments
Read more

Trump is to gut the labs.

By scooby
The budget has a 20% decrease to DOE office of science, 20% cut to NIH. NASA also gets a cut. This will  have a huge negative effect on the lab. Crazy, juts crazy. He also wants to cut NEA and PBS, this may not seem like  a big deal but they get very little money and do great things.
124 comments
Read more

Rumor corner

By scooby
LLNS may have excluded the wrong people in last VSSOP? The exclusions were based on outdated job categories and related skills. ULM are now thinking that in the future, job categories and functional areas will have to be re-defined. The next VSSOP/ISP will be based on the new categories and functional areas. The questions I have are: 1) Why didnt they think of that before the transition. It seems like their style is “change things as you go”. Planning is out the window! 2) Who will give input on the new changes? The next RIF apparently is going to be more lucrative than the VSSOP. Depending on the length of employment, a RIFed person, not only gets their 1 week pay per year of service but also from 30 to 120 days notice, essentially 30 to 120 days pay. Please feel free to comment on the rumors or add new ones you actually heard.
92 comments
Read more