Skip to main content

Gemini, the new AI model

 Google announced Gemini yesterday, a new AI model which among other things has advanced capabilities in programming and understanding scientific literature. A version of this is now freely available to the general public in Google Bard:


https://youtu.be/_TVnM9dmUSk?si=J5Lrk0dtIw-2-FWh

https://www.theverge.com/2023/12/6/23989744/google-bard-gemini-model-chatbot-ai


Comments

Anonymous said…


For the first time I am starting to get scared for the future of the nation. Musk is going crazy and AI is getting more powerful, imagine that
kind of power in the hands of the conspiracy theorists, the uneducated, the hateful, and supremists. If we just let anybody have access to this it will lead to disaster and we all know it. Guys like Musk use misguided ideas of free speech so that nut cases can get access to technology to spew all sorts of hate. We have to stop this.
Anonymous said…
Elon Musk is now saying AGI will happen within three years, by the way.

Some of the news on Gemini was that parts of the demo were "faked" or exaggerated, meaning that the capabilities demonstrated were not fully present in the prototype, but may be in the near future.
Anonymous said…
Is AGI already here?

https://www.noemamag.com/artificial-general-intelligence-is-already-here/

That is, humans have a natural bias that they are "better" than chatbots, while in fact chatbots simply have a different form of intelligence.

Popular posts from this blog

Plutonium Shots on NIF.

Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises to pursue such stupid ideas as doing Plutonium experiments on NIF. The stupidity arises from the fact that a huge population is placed at risk in the short and long term. Why do this kind of experiment in a heavily populated area? Only a moron would push that kind of imbecile area. Do it somewhere else in the god forsaken hills of Los Alamos. Why should the communities in the Bay Area be subjected to such increased risk just because the lab's NIF has failed twice and is trying the Hail Mary pass of doing an SNM experiment just to justify their existence? Those Laser EoS techniques and the people analyzing the raw data are all just BAD anyways. You know what comes next after they do the experiment. They'll figure out that they need larger samples. More risk for the local population. Stop this imbecilic pursuit. They wan...

Trump is to gut the labs.

The budget has a 20% decrease to DOE office of science, 20% cut to NIH. NASA also gets a cut. This will  have a huge negative effect on the lab. Crazy, juts crazy. He also wants to cut NEA and PBS, this may not seem like  a big deal but they get very little money and do great things.

tcp1 looking good

I just received my annual TCP-1 letter from LLNS and a summary of the LLNS Pension Plan. Looked in pretty good shape in 2013. About 35% overfunded (funding target attainment percentage = 134.92%). This was a decrease from 2012 where it was 51% overfunded (funding target attainment percentage = 151.59%). They did note that the 2012 change in the law on how liabilities are calculated using interest rates improved the plan's position. Without the change the funding target attainment percentages would have been 118% (2012) and 105% (2013). 2013 assets = $2,057,866,902 2013 liabilities = $1,525,162,784 vs 2012 assets = $1,844,924,947 2012 liabilities = $1,217,043,150 It was also noted that a slightly different calculation method ("fair market value") designed to show a clearer picture of the plan' status as December 31, 2013 had; Assets = $2,403,098,433 Liabilities = $2,068,984,256 Funding ratio = 116.15% Its a closed plan with 3,781 participants. Of that number, 3,151 wer...