Skip to main content

Age and pay discrimination at LLNS

Anonymously contributed:

Age and pay discrimination are alive and well @ LLNL-LLNS. The good old boys & girls continue. Due to the secrecy of wages/salaries at LLNS I had no gauges as to where I stood w/ my peers. I just recently found out where I stand and I am very disappointed and offended. I am a 60+ year young, 20+ career employee and have an Engineering degree. No I do not want to retire, I like my job but I want to be treated fairly. I began in the Plant Engineering Crafts Shops and moved into the coordination field. I have had a great deal of training and performed many, many types of work from grunt to medium level management tasks and activities. I am only a 5XX after 20+ years. I have been held back from advancement (5XX > 3XX Series) and been given negligible pay raises compared to my peers while performing the same work tasks. In other words, in my humble opinion, I have the same Skills, Knowledge & Abilities (SKAs) or more w/o the benefit of moderate advancement or equal pay increases as my peers and co-workers. I know the same old worn out complaints. Could someone advise of a good attorney?

Comments

Anonymous said…
If you still have a job I wouldnt start a fight. A fight will bring you down for years and if you survive with your health and your job you will be lucky. While the fight is on your salary will freeze as your performance appraisals will drop.

Try approaching it more calmly. Talk to HR, have them run some comps. Be nice, see what happens. Dont demand, let them do their own comparisons and get back to you.
Anonymous said…
Your story is just your story. No one knows the truth or the fiction of it. Everyone who is passed over for promotion feels taken advantage of. No one here can legitimately give you support or condemn you. If you truly feel unfairly treated, go to HR or go to a federal agency, although long experience shows you would be better if you just said goodbye to your current employer and sought a better position elsewhere. If that is not an option, maybe you are not as great an employee as you think. It is a really bad career decision to allow yourself to be trapped in a job.
Anonymous said…
I can understand your indignation at being treated in a way you feel is unjust. But, suing them can bankrupt you, even if you win. It cannot bankrupt LLNS. Is this really what you want to risk to feel vindicated? If so, then sue them and make your lawyer rich.
Anonymous said…
Yes... GWilliam, Ivary, Chiosso, Cavalli & Brewer
1999 Harrison Street, Suite 1600
Oakland, California 94612-3528
510 832 5411
Anonymous said…
I sympathize with your situation. I can also say I have walked in your shoes. I stopped asking any managers to grow me > 25 years ago and took the action to grow myself. That action proved to me that we are responsible for our own growth, both in content and salary. Forget the lawyers; mngmt has 20 years of PAs, you have a gripe. You will bankrupt youself and destroy your job. Go to HR, ask for comps, build your own list of comparable employees and compare with that of HR's. Push your career, change jobs, move to the Program. Growth does exist for those who pursue.
Anonymous said…
Discrimination against the "aged" has gone on for centuries. It's present at all the Labs. Problem is, most of the time it's never overt, hard to prove, and overt cases where the Lab has clearly discriminated are settled out of court by paying off the claimant. At Los Alamos, Anastasio settled (payed off) many, many cases out of court during his tenure to make things easier for MacMillan. Keep in mind, if you agree to a monetary settlement, you WILL sign an agreement that you will never work at the Labs again.
Anonymous said…
Try approaching it more calmly. Talk to HR, have them run some comps. Be nice, see what happens. Dont demand, let them do their own comparisons and get back to you.

October 22, 2011 6:53 PM

Talking to HR is a waste of time. HR works at and for the pleasure of management. Believe me, I was manager at Los Alamos for 30-years.
Anonymous said…
a mistake in his career was staying with the lab.
20 straight years will earn less than leaving after 5, picking up some outside skills, then returning at a higher pay grade.
Anonymous said…
Someone just came back after leaving the Lab 3 years ago. Hint: in OB/ICS.
This person proved you are worth more when you come from the outside.
Someone from within the dept could have been promoted to that position.
Anonymous said…
Age discrimination is a time-honored practice at both LLNL and LANL. They have turned it into an art form.

Try stopping it and see where that gets you. They'll have their lab lawyers all over you!
Richard Marsh said…
I think most of the answeres are right on the mark. I was a 'top 10'Sr EE COordinator and after 23 years, I realised I was never going to make enough money... although I loved the work and great minds at LLNL. So I left and ended up making a lot of money (seven figures)from royalties for my work for others. I have not had a full time office job since Livermore and now I am 65. It seems you cant have it both ways -- great R&D job and great money. Leverage what you have learned and move on to make the money you deserve.

-Richard Marsh
Cool, CA.
(rmarsh@calweb.com)
Anonymous said…
You could HR and file a grievance, and it will get you nowhere because HR is not there for you. Then your management could put you in a low level job. Then they could lower your clearance because you don't need a Q in your position, thus limiting where you can go in the lab. Then lower you classification because of the job content and you will be high in the salary range without hope of a raise nomatter how you are ranked. Has it happened, yes it has.
Anonymous said…
I know Dick and like him, good to hear that he is doing well.

I took a different approach, and hunkered down for the long haul. Weathered the storms, held my tongue, worked effectively and enjoyed the great companionship for over 30 years.

Just separated with a small nest egg and an adequate pension and, thankfully with my health.

It was worth it, I think. Blood now pressure near zero, lots of good memories and some that I'd like to forget.

You have a good opportunity. If you stick with it, you will be paid +/- 20% of where you compare over the long run, and either way the jobs are pretty good. Working conditions are pretty good, most people are great,though some are memorable shits (still get lots of good stories). Benefits for most are still exceptional, though under pressure.

But the whole country is under pressure, as the imbalances of federal fiscal and regulatory irresponsibility and widespread speculation are wrung from the economy. It is not clear that being at the lab is a poor place to weather this storm.

I remember starting in the aftermath of the 1974 recession there, then the 1982 downturn, the excesses of the late "80s, 2001 bubble as well as the beginnings of the great recession of 2007. it took 3 -15 years to return to good times each time then, and probably will take that long again.

If you are covering your bills, building some equity and a pension, you should consider whether a longer term view might be more beneficial.

Popular posts from this blog

Plutonium Shots on NIF.

Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises to pursue such stupid ideas as doing Plutonium experiments on NIF. The stupidity arises from the fact that a huge population is placed at risk in the short and long term. Why do this kind of experiment in a heavily populated area? Only a moron would push that kind of imbecile area. Do it somewhere else in the god forsaken hills of Los Alamos. Why should the communities in the Bay Area be subjected to such increased risk just because the lab's NIF has failed twice and is trying the Hail Mary pass of doing an SNM experiment just to justify their existence? Those Laser EoS techniques and the people analyzing the raw data are all just BAD anyways. You know what comes next after they do the experiment. They'll figure out that they need larger samples. More risk for the local population. Stop this imbecilic pursuit. They wan...

Trump is to gut the labs.

The budget has a 20% decrease to DOE office of science, 20% cut to NIH. NASA also gets a cut. This will  have a huge negative effect on the lab. Crazy, juts crazy. He also wants to cut NEA and PBS, this may not seem like  a big deal but they get very little money and do great things.

LLNL un-diversity

Actual post from Dec. 15 from one of the streams. This is a real topic. As far as promoting women and minorities even if their qualifications are not as good as the white male scientists, I am all for it. We need diversity at the lab and if that is what it takes, so be it.  Quit your whining. Look around the lab, what do you see? White male geezers. How many African Americans do you see at the lab? Virtually none. LLNL is one of the MOST undiverse places you will see. Face it folks, LLNL is an institution of white male privilege and they don't want to give up their privileged positions. California, a state of majority Hispanics has the "crown jewel" LLNL nestled in the middle of it with very FEW Hispanics at all!