Skip to main content

Fatality at LANL

Image
By scooby
Fatality at LANL

One Dead in Pajarito Road Rollover Crash
By Carol A. Clark
Saturday, September 17, 2011 at 11:04 am (Updated: September 18, 2:47 pm)
A person was killed Saturday morning in a rollover crash on Pajarito Road, which is restricted and on Los Alamos National Laboratory property.

In typical "no information LANS policy", nothing been conveyed to LANL employees on this incident.

Comments

Anonymous said…
Garbage. This was not a "fatality at LANL" this was a simple one-vehicle rollover fatal accident that could have occurred anywhere. Get over the sensationalizing of mundane crap (except of course for the family who grieves).
10/09/2011 9:16 PM
Anonymous said…
Sorry pal, unfortunately, this fatality occurred on a Saturday on Pajarito road just a few hundred ft from the entrance to TA-46. It occurred on Lab property. Another example of LANS management pushing people to the limit to work on weekends.
10/10/2011 10:44 AM
Anonymous said…
Another example of LANS management pushing people to the limit to work on weekends.

October 10, 2011 10:44 AM

And you have information that this person doesn't normally work Saturdays? Do you think everyone works Mon - Fri? Working Saturday causes you to crash your car? If you are required to come in on a Saturday that is beyond your "limit"? Try to get a grip on your hatred of LANS. Your post is just stupid.

A LANL retiree.
10/10/2011 7:30 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Plutonium Shots on NIF.

By scooby
Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises to pursue such stupid ideas as doing Plutonium experiments on NIF. The stupidity arises from the fact that a huge population is placed at risk in the short and long term. Why do this kind of experiment in a heavily populated area? Only a moron would push that kind of imbecile area. Do it somewhere else in the god forsaken hills of Los Alamos. Why should the communities in the Bay Area be subjected to such increased risk just because the lab's NIF has failed twice and is trying the Hail Mary pass of doing an SNM experiment just to justify their existence? Those Laser EoS techniques and the people analyzing the raw data are all just BAD anyways. You know what comes next after they do the experiment. They'll figure out that they need larger samples. More risk for the local population. Stop this imbecilic pursuit. They wan...
155 comments
Read more

Trump is to gut the labs.

By scooby
The budget has a 20% decrease to DOE office of science, 20% cut to NIH. NASA also gets a cut. This will  have a huge negative effect on the lab. Crazy, juts crazy. He also wants to cut NEA and PBS, this may not seem like  a big deal but they get very little money and do great things.
124 comments
Read more

LLNL un-diversity

By scooby
Actual post from Dec. 15 from one of the streams. This is a real topic. As far as promoting women and minorities even if their qualifications are not as good as the white male scientists, I am all for it. We need diversity at the lab and if that is what it takes, so be it.  Quit your whining. Look around the lab, what do you see? White male geezers. How many African Americans do you see at the lab? Virtually none. LLNL is one of the MOST undiverse places you will see. Face it folks, LLNL is an institution of white male privilege and they don't want to give up their privileged positions. California, a state of majority Hispanics has the "crown jewel" LLNL nestled in the middle of it with very FEW Hispanics at all!
79 comments
Read more