Skip to main content

DOE restructuring

Anonymously contributed:

DOE restructuring? At least, someone is thinking about it.


NY Times article

Comments

Anonymous said…
Wow! This could be the big one folks.

Some highlights

" Mr. Friedman wrote that the department spent nearly $13 billion a year to run 16 separate laboratories but that only about half of that money went toward actual research, with 49 percent paying for overhead and capital spending. "

I thought we spent
less than 40% on research.

"the department should also reabsorb the agency that handles nuclear weapons, the National Nuclear Security Administration, which was made a separate organization in 2000 because of security concerns. "

Get rid of NNSA? What does NNSA do?

"“have a significant impact” in states like Idaho, New Mexico, South Carolina, Tennessee and Washington"

Well at least California and LLNL are safe.

"He warned that “painful” staff reductions were certain to come as Congress sought deep federal budget cuts in the months ahead. "

Sounds about right. Of course this is not just going to hard on LLNL, LANL, but also Argonne, Oak Ridge and so on. Hell even NSF and NIH are going to be hit.
Anonymous said…
Here we go again – must be another Presidential election coming up. Wake me if there’s any real change.
Anonymous said…
NNSA was always a bastard agency. It should either be an independent entity (a la AEC, vastly preferred), or absorbed back into DOE, where it will be vulnerable to know-nothing Republican plans to ship the nuclear weapons work to DoD. Such a plan would ignore decades of civilian control of nuclear weapon research and development that began in the late 1040's for good reasons that today's idiots forget or never learned.
Anonymous said…
Is Jerry Freidman still at DOE? Jeeezzz! Retire Jerry retire!
Anonymous said…
http://www.slideshare.net/govloop/colin-powells-18-lessons-for-leadership
Anonymous said…
DOE restructuring == Massive job reductions at the DOE/NNSA labs.
Anonymous said…
$6.5B on research each year? Wow.

Hope some of it comes to fruition
Anonymous said…
$6.5B on research each year? Wow.

Hope some of it comes to fruition

November 23, 2011 12:35 PM

Your use of the term "fruition" in connection with research shows you have no concept of what research is. Apply the term to "development" and you're closer to the mark.
Anonymous said…
DOE and restructuring. An oxymoron.

Popular posts from this blog

Plutonium Shots on NIF.

Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises to pursue such stupid ideas as doing Plutonium experiments on NIF. The stupidity arises from the fact that a huge population is placed at risk in the short and long term. Why do this kind of experiment in a heavily populated area? Only a moron would push that kind of imbecile area. Do it somewhere else in the god forsaken hills of Los Alamos. Why should the communities in the Bay Area be subjected to such increased risk just because the lab's NIF has failed twice and is trying the Hail Mary pass of doing an SNM experiment just to justify their existence? Those Laser EoS techniques and the people analyzing the raw data are all just BAD anyways. You know what comes next after they do the experiment. They'll figure out that they need larger samples. More risk for the local population. Stop this imbecilic pursuit. They wan...

Trump is to gut the labs.

The budget has a 20% decrease to DOE office of science, 20% cut to NIH. NASA also gets a cut. This will  have a huge negative effect on the lab. Crazy, juts crazy. He also wants to cut NEA and PBS, this may not seem like  a big deal but they get very little money and do great things.

Why Workplace Jargon Is A Big Problem

From the Huffington Post Why Workplace Jargon Is A Big Problem http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/04/25/work-words_n_5159868.html?utm_hp_ref=business&ir=Business When we replace a specific task with a vague expression, we grant the task more magnitude than it deserves. If we don't describe an activity plainly, it seems less like an easily achievable goal and more like a cloudy state of existence that fills unknowable amounts of time. A fog of fast and empty language has seeped into the workplace. I say it's time we air it out, making room for simple, concrete words, and, therefore, more deliberate actions. By striking the following 26 words from your speech, I think you'll find that you're not quite as overwhelmed as you thought you were. Count the number that LLNLs mangers use.  touch base circle back bandwidth - impactful - utilize - table the discussion deep dive - engagement - viral value-add - one-sheet deliverable - work product - incentivise - take it to the ...