This BLOG is for LLNL present and past employees, friends of LLNL and anyone impacted by the privatization of the Lab to express their opinions and expose the waste, wrongdoing and any kind of injustice against employees and taxpayers by LLNS/DOE/NNSA.
The opinions stated are personal opinions. Therefore,
The BLOG author may or may not agree with them before making the decision to post them.
Comments not conforming to BLOG rules are deleted.
Blog author serves as a moderator.
For new topics or suggestions, email jlscoob5@gmail.com
Blog rules
Stay on topic.
No profanity, threatening language, pornography.
NO NAME CALLING.
No political debate.
Posts and comments are posted several times a day.
Monday, November 21, 2011
How commited are you to the LAB under LLNS/LANS poll results
Respondens: 56
More: 1
less: 41
the same: 14
2 comments:
Anonymous
said...
I'm sure LANS/LLNS would declare this vote a resounding "success". Speaking of polls or upward appraisals, what ever happened to the upward appraisal conducted at LANS during the Anastasio era? The LANS/LLNS management maintain the philosophy "if we wait long enough the staff (i.e. minions) will forget about it" . Wrong!
Some aspects of the privatization have been beneficial while others disasterous. At least at the middle management level they are putting in place at least a few better (standard) management practices. The top managers however show little interest in the lab's function of doing the science. And the bloated upper management has gotten even larger, and it was top heavy before they arrived. They should cut about half the management to get our costs down, not that I think they would ever, ever do that.
2 comments:
I'm sure LANS/LLNS would declare this vote a resounding "success". Speaking of polls or upward appraisals, what ever happened to the upward appraisal conducted at LANS during the Anastasio era? The LANS/LLNS management maintain the philosophy "if we wait long enough the staff (i.e. minions) will forget about it" . Wrong!
Some aspects of the privatization have been beneficial while others disasterous. At least at the middle management level they are putting in place at least a few better (standard) management practices. The top managers however show little interest in the lab's function of doing the science. And the bloated upper management has gotten even larger, and it was top heavy before they arrived. They should cut about half the management to get our costs down, not that I think they would ever, ever do that.
Post a Comment