Skip to main content

Charlie "MIT" McMillan Holiday Message

Anonymously contributed:

Charlie "MIT" McMillan Holiday Message

Not to be outdone by "Livermore" the following is our Holiday message from our "fearless" leader none other than Charlie "MIT" McMillan, a REAL leader (which he constantly reminds us), MIT PhD physics graduate (which he constantly reminds us), former LLNL employee and manager (which he constantly reminds us), weapon designer extraordinaire (which he constantly reminds us), the man responsible for bringing us Bret Knapp, our next LANS Director (which he ALWAYS reminds us) and our Savior from the recent Los Conchas Fire (which he constantly reminds us). He's the MAN!


The first thing I’d like to say in this holiday message is "Thank you."

What we have accomplished this year as a Laboratory—thanks to your creativity, innovation, and unwavering dedication to delivering on our commitments—is nothing short of amazing.

We will gather with our families this holiday season knowing that our daily work continues to ensure the peace and prosperity of this nation as it has for the past 70 years.

Our breakthroughs span the entire periodic table and hold promise in fields from medicine, energy security, and nanotechnology to the next generation of supercomputers…and so much more.

I appreciate your commitment to excellence. I know many of you put in long hours. Please send a special thank you to your families for me; we couldn’t do it without their love and support.

I know we are entering uncertain times for the Lab. Chances are, things will still be uncertain when we return from the holiday break. I hope you’ll put those thoughts aside for the next couple of weeks.

Enjoy the spirit of giving as we remember our neighbors who are less fortunate. Take an extra minute or two and relish your time away with family and friends. Remember to do it safely—the holidays can be hectic. Come back refreshed and ready to pick up where we left off.

On behalf of the entire management team, I wish you and your family all the best for this holiday season.

Charlie

Comments

Anonymous said…
"Chances are, things will still be uncertain when we return from the holiday break". Charlie

Maybe so, maybe no, we don't know? Roll the dice again Marquez, snake-eyes, again?
Anonymous said…
Please send a special thank you to your families for me; we couldn’t do it without their love and support...Charlie

This makes me BARF in view of the way LANS management, and in particular Bret Knapp, has verbally abused workers at LANS. This is disgusting!
Anonymous said…
Interesting style contrast in the two messages. Parney uses "I" once - in the final sentence. Charlie has a different approach.
Anonymous said…
"Our breakthroughs span the entire periodic table"

Perhaps a bit modest.
Anonymous said…
I've got news for you Charlie, the actions of your ruthless gang of thugs (e.g. Knapp) you call your "Management Team" during the past year speak louder than your phony "love" message. What a crock!
Anonymous said…
When McMillan testified recently to the DNFSB on TA-55 nuclear safety he spent 30-minutes telling them about his credentials (what classes he took at MIT), 15-seconds telling them what he knew about nuclear safety and nuclear facilities (which was basically nothing), and 10-seconds that "he would rather be inside the plutonium facility during a 9-scale earthquake than his house". His testimony was in one word, "embarrassing".
Anonymous said…
What were seeing from McMillan is his inferiority complex with his lack of management skills and his minimal technical accomplishments. His fallback position is always saying "at Livermore" and "at MIT".

By the way, did anyone actually see McMillan's MIT diploma? I know there have been several individuals from Livermore that had "faked" their academic credentials. It seems everyone has forgotten (and would like to forget) about "Dr." Michael Campbell. I hate to act like Donald Trump, but, can I see McMillan's MIT diploma? Where is it?
Anonymous said…
December 24, 2011 6:03 AM

Just add it on to the long and growing list of recent embarrassing words and actions. Guess the most expensive house on the Hill is not good enough?
Anonymous said…
Just add it on to the long and growing list of recent embarrassing words and actions. Guess the most expensive house on the Hill is not good enough?

December 24, 2011 6:21 AM

With all the cash he spent on his mansion one would think it would be at least 9-Richter scale "capable".

Since he would rather be inside PF-4 during an a 9-scale earthquake, how can it be arranged for him (and Knapp)? Anybody?
Anonymous said…
Oh ya I forgot about Dr Campbell.
But it is irrelevant now since
one no longer needs a Phd to be at
such a high level. Below is a
some info from the NYT.

---------------------------

Jeff Richardson, a laboratory spokesman, said yesterday that Mr. Campbell had falsely allowed the laboratory to believe he had a doctorate from Princeton University, but that Mr. Campbell's reasons for resigning had nothing to do with the installation.

''In fact,'' Mr. Richardson said, ''Mike had completed his Ph.D. course work when he joined Livermore in 1977, but he never finished his dissertation.''

Asked whether a Ph.D. was a requisite for holding Mr. Campbell's position, Mr. Richardson said, ''We require all senior managers to hold a Ph.D. or its equivalent in experience.''
Anonymous said…
By the way, did anyone actually see McMillan's MIT diploma?

You can bet that one was vetted at the time of the contract competition.
Anonymous said…
Looks like most posts have a pretty low view of McMillan. Examination of his PADs might indicate that he is the MOST qualified of the current crop.
Anonymous said…
A lot has changed at LANL in one year. Anastasio, Mallory and Reese all left. Time will tell if their relief watch is up to the task.
Anonymous said…
That's one thing you have to give credit to Bret Knapp for, you can't fake the poor academic credentials this guy has. I mean any worse and Knapp would be John "Bluto" Blutarsky from Animal House with his 0.0 GPA. I must admit there is a striking resemblance and attitude.
Anonymous said…
...you can't fake the poor academic credentials this guy has.

Oh give it a break. A bachelors from an undergraduate-focused engineering program ranked between the military academies, and an M.S. from a UC campus, is not 'poor'.

We're sorry that for all the Research 1 PhDs on the mesa, they could not scrap together a home team that would be compelling for the contract competition. Go figure.
Anonymous said…
We're sorry that for all the Research 1 PhDs on the mesa, they could not scrap together a home team that would be compelling for the contract competition. Go figure.

December 25, 2011 12:00 AM

As everyone but you seems to know, the contract was wired for Bechtel from the start. The Lockheed-Martin opposition, led by Ambassador C. Paul Robinson (ex Lanl AD-NucWeapons, and then Sandia President for several years) and Don Cook(ex Sandia, who subsequently led AWE and is now directing yhr weapons work at all 3 labs and NTS as D'Ag's deputy) never stood a chance.
Anonymous said…
...you can't fake the poor academic credentials this guy has.

Oh give it a break. A bachelors from an undergraduate-focused engineering program ranked between the military academies, and an M.S. from a UC campus, is not 'poor'.

December 25, 2011 12:00 AM

You must be one of those "warm bodies" we hired from NMSU that works in W-Division? From that perspective Knapp is "supreme".
Anonymous said…
Oh give it a break. A bachelors from an undergraduate-focused engineering program ranked between the military academies, and an M.S. from a UC campus, is not 'poor'.

December 25, 2011 12:00 AM

If the bachelors is NOT from UC Berkeley, which it wasn't, your absolutely right it's JUST A UC campus.

Popular posts from this blog

Plutonium Shots on NIF.

Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises to pursue such stupid ideas as doing Plutonium experiments on NIF. The stupidity arises from the fact that a huge population is placed at risk in the short and long term. Why do this kind of experiment in a heavily populated area? Only a moron would push that kind of imbecile area. Do it somewhere else in the god forsaken hills of Los Alamos. Why should the communities in the Bay Area be subjected to such increased risk just because the lab's NIF has failed twice and is trying the Hail Mary pass of doing an SNM experiment just to justify their existence? Those Laser EoS techniques and the people analyzing the raw data are all just BAD anyways. You know what comes next after they do the experiment. They'll figure out that they need larger samples. More risk for the local population. Stop this imbecilic pursuit. They wan...

Trump is to gut the labs.

The budget has a 20% decrease to DOE office of science, 20% cut to NIH. NASA also gets a cut. This will  have a huge negative effect on the lab. Crazy, juts crazy. He also wants to cut NEA and PBS, this may not seem like  a big deal but they get very little money and do great things.

LLNL un-diversity

Actual post from Dec. 15 from one of the streams. This is a real topic. As far as promoting women and minorities even if their qualifications are not as good as the white male scientists, I am all for it. We need diversity at the lab and if that is what it takes, so be it.  Quit your whining. Look around the lab, what do you see? White male geezers. How many African Americans do you see at the lab? Virtually none. LLNL is one of the MOST undiverse places you will see. Face it folks, LLNL is an institution of white male privilege and they don't want to give up their privileged positions. California, a state of majority Hispanics has the "crown jewel" LLNL nestled in the middle of it with very FEW Hispanics at all!