Blog purpose
This BLOG is for LLNL present and past employees, friends of LLNL and anyone impacted by the privatization of the Lab to express their opinions and expose the waste, wrongdoing and any kind of injustice against employees and taxpayers by LLNS/DOE/NNSA.
The opinions stated are personal opinions. Therefore,
The BLOG author may or may not agree with them before making the decision to post them.
Comments not conforming to BLOG rules are deleted.
Blog author serves as a moderator.
For new topics or suggestions, email jlscoob5@gmail.com
Blog rules
- Stay on topic.
- No profanity, threatening language, pornography.
- NO NAME CALLING.
- No political debate.
- Posts and comments are posted several times a day.
Monday, July 22, 2019
Taxpayers won’t have to pay Hanford contractor’s costs in discrimination lawsuit
"The appeals court upheld an April 2018 decision of the U.S. Court of Federal Claims that the Department of Energy did not need to reimburse Bechtel National $500,000 for its legal defense costs in discrimination lawsuits filed by two employees. Both were fired. Bechtel argued that previously DOE had always reimbursed Bechtel for its costs to defend and settle lawsuits, including employment discrimination claims."
https://www.tri-cityherald.com/news/local/hanford/article232789237.html
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Posts you viewed tbe most last 30 days
-
Good article in Nature News on progress on Z with a mention of NIF's problems http://www.nature.com/news/triple-threat-method-sparks-h...
-
Actual post from Dec. 15 from one of the streams. This is a real topic. As far as promoting women and minorities even if their qualification...
-
" ...If there were damning factual evidence of anything untoward, it would obviously have been brought forward with great fanfare......
2 comments:
"Bechtel argued that previously DOE had always reimbursed Bechtel for its costs to defend and settle lawsuits, including employment discrimination claims."
At least in this case, it looks like DOE refused to further enable Bechtel's employee treatment practices, and as such, deemed Bechtel's related legal expenses unallowable for reimbursement. Good for DOE!
This must be rare and local to Hanford. Bechtel wouldn't expect question free legal fee reimbursements at LANL or LLNL right?
Post a Comment