Blog purpose

This BLOG is for LLNL present and past employees, friends of LLNL and anyone impacted by the privatization of the Lab to express their opinions and expose the waste, wrongdoing and any kind of injustice against employees and taxpayers by LLNS/DOE/NNSA. The opinions stated are personal opinions. Therefore, The BLOG author may or may not agree with them before making the decision to post them. Comments not conforming to BLOG rules are deleted. Blog author serves as a moderator. For new topics or suggestions, email jlscoob5@gmail.com

Blog rules

  • Stay on topic.
  • No profanity, threatening language, pornography.
  • NO NAME CALLING.
  • No political debate.
  • Posts and comments are posted several times a day.

Wednesday, January 24, 2024

LLNS CONTRACT

  ******.    NOTE  *******

I am working on keeping this post on top of the blog for a while. This allows us to discuss more elaborately. 

The Blogger "top post" feature is malfunctioning. 


The basic term of the LLNS contract No. DE-AC52-07NA27344, will end on September 30, 2026. What policies and practices should the NNSA (hopefully with employee input) preserve, review, or change for the next LLC contractor?

7 comments:

Anonymous said...

What is malfunctioning Scooby?

Scooby said...

The feature I have or had to promote a post to top of be log.
It is not working for me.

Anonymous said...

Many LLNS employees have zero experience with UC/LLNL management. Yet, UC/LLNL can be a valuable benchmark for the selection of our next contractor. I think an effort to produce a framework of expectations for the next LLNL contractor by current employees and retirees, coordinated with the NNSA and outside the influence of LLNS, will be helpful.

Hopefully, the prolonged removal of LANS management from LANL, will not be a NNSA model for the selection of our next LLNL contractor. No one year extensions please.

Anonymous said...

Scooby, this next LLNL contractor topic hasn’t generated much in the way of suggestions for selecting the next LLC. This topic appears to be squarely aligned with your “impacts of the privatization of the Lab” blog purpose. Are LLNS employees just very satisfied with the current contractor, or is this a case of cold feet on the subject?

Scooby said...

From my experience, the workforce has been pacified with relatively good
salaries and raises in the last 5-10 years. For many it is just a job.
LLNS is the most unqualified contractor for national security.

Anonymous said...

As 1/26 6:21 stated above, based of some recent all hands discussions the majority of the labs workforce has less than 5 years experience working for Livermore. The average age of many of these new hires puts them at 8 years old when UC last ran the lab. If they were multi generational employees they might remember the good times when their mom or dad worked for UC when they were growing up.


As far as current issues.. well there certainly have been some major changes especially in the past few weeks that will affect many employees in the future.

Anonymous said...

Would you care to elaborate on the changes?

Posts you viewed tbe most last 30 days