Skip to main content

Congressional Budget Report 2008

By Anonymous
This is a large document but if you do a search using the words _Lawrence Livermore National Lab_ it will take you to every page that pertains to us. I suggest you look at pages 569 - 581 and note what projects are getting what level of funding. Of course this can all be altered at the directors level, but it's what you were slated to get.

Congressional Budget Report 2008

Comments

Anonymous said…
Does anyone care to write Homer and ask him where those employee commentsare posted. It's been a long time and I for one want to know what the employees had to say. Homers address is at this web site. I think 8000 e-mails should get his attention.
12/21/2007 12:50 PM
Anonymous said…
"This is a large document but if you do a search using the words _Lawrence Livermore National Lab_ it will take you to every page that pertains to us..."

This report doesn't reflect the final budget picture. It shows the RRW funding at 80 million plus. Funding for the RRW has been canceled.
12/22/2007 7:37 AM
Anonymous said…
December 22, 2007 7:37 AM

That could only mean one thing.

There will be more than 900 people out the door by April of 2008, you can bank on it. What amazes me more than anything is, why and how did ULM become RIF exempt.

That's 17 pages of overpaid pukes that are cutting you throats and getting paid more for doing it and none of them are getting axed.

I guess that manament for you.
12/22/2007 10:13 AM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Plutonium Shots on NIF.

By scooby
Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises to pursue such stupid ideas as doing Plutonium experiments on NIF. The stupidity arises from the fact that a huge population is placed at risk in the short and long term. Why do this kind of experiment in a heavily populated area? Only a moron would push that kind of imbecile area. Do it somewhere else in the god forsaken hills of Los Alamos. Why should the communities in the Bay Area be subjected to such increased risk just because the lab's NIF has failed twice and is trying the Hail Mary pass of doing an SNM experiment just to justify their existence? Those Laser EoS techniques and the people analyzing the raw data are all just BAD anyways. You know what comes next after they do the experiment. They'll figure out that they need larger samples. More risk for the local population. Stop this imbecilic pursuit. They wan...
155 comments
Read more

Trump is to gut the labs.

By scooby
The budget has a 20% decrease to DOE office of science, 20% cut to NIH. NASA also gets a cut. This will  have a huge negative effect on the lab. Crazy, juts crazy. He also wants to cut NEA and PBS, this may not seem like  a big deal but they get very little money and do great things.
124 comments
Read more

tcp1 looking good

By scooby
I just received my annual TCP-1 letter from LLNS and a summary of the LLNS Pension Plan. Looked in pretty good shape in 2013. About 35% overfunded (funding target attainment percentage = 134.92%). This was a decrease from 2012 where it was 51% overfunded (funding target attainment percentage = 151.59%). They did note that the 2012 change in the law on how liabilities are calculated using interest rates improved the plan's position. Without the change the funding target attainment percentages would have been 118% (2012) and 105% (2013). 2013 assets = $2,057,866,902 2013 liabilities = $1,525,162,784 vs 2012 assets = $1,844,924,947 2012 liabilities = $1,217,043,150 It was also noted that a slightly different calculation method ("fair market value") designed to show a clearer picture of the plan' status as December 31, 2013 had; Assets = $2,403,098,433 Liabilities = $2,068,984,256 Funding ratio = 116.15% Its a closed plan with 3,781 participants. Of that number, 3,151 wer...
105 comments
Read more