Skip to main content

Good or Bad news for TCP-2 Employees ?

Benefits-value comparator assessment list approved by NNSA Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC (LLNS) received approval from the National Nuclear Security Administration Wednesday on a list of benefits-value comparator companies, to fulfill one of its requirements in maintaining its current Total Compensation Package (TCP-2).

NNSA accepted LLNS’ request for an equivalent TCP-2 to Los Alamos National Laboratory back in July. That acceptance was conditional for one year, and required re-evaluation of comparator companies and analysis of the LLNS TCP-2 benefits compared to this list, as well as an analysis of benefits costs.

The first deliverable for this reevaluation was a new list of comparator companies, to be approved by NNSA by the end of 2007. The current list of comparator companies includes companies comparable to the Laboratory.

Eight of the companies are located or headquartered in California; four are located or headquartered in the greater Bay Area.“I am pleased with getting over this first hurdle,” said Tammy Jernigan, associate director for Strategic Human Capital Management.

“We plan to work closely with Los Alamos as well as LSO on completing this assessment.”

Comments

Anonymous said…
well, in the tri-valley piece a few weeks back it mentionned that George was "going to bat" for LLNL employees to improve benefits in order to make it more competitive with other bay area companies. We'll see if ULM has the stones to make this happen. unfortunately, i'm afraid that this is a case where past performance will correlate with future expectation.
Anonymous said…
Say goodbye to your 3.5% to 5.5% age factor contributions. TCP-2 people are screwed and will not and can not make up what they were screwed out of by NNSA when they took their UCRP from them.

It's my hopes that LLNL will never be able to employee anyone ever again. Anyone in their right mine would never come to work for LLNL for the wages or the benefits.

You can get better wages and better benefits at a lot of places.
Anonymous said…
"Say goodbye to your 3.5% to 5.5% age factor contributions."

Maybe much later this year, if at all this year. The BenVal study early- to mid-summer, with a plan to cut back benefits, if needed to get to 105%, submitted to NNSA by the end of summer. And then NNSA will have to review and approve any changes. Meanwhile, the service-based contributions continue to accrue to your accounts (they can't take it back after they've given it to you). And until we see the list of comparator companies, anything's possible.

Popular posts from this blog

Plutonium Shots on NIF.

Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises to pursue such stupid ideas as doing Plutonium experiments on NIF. The stupidity arises from the fact that a huge population is placed at risk in the short and long term. Why do this kind of experiment in a heavily populated area? Only a moron would push that kind of imbecile area. Do it somewhere else in the god forsaken hills of Los Alamos. Why should the communities in the Bay Area be subjected to such increased risk just because the lab's NIF has failed twice and is trying the Hail Mary pass of doing an SNM experiment just to justify their existence? Those Laser EoS techniques and the people analyzing the raw data are all just BAD anyways. You know what comes next after they do the experiment. They'll figure out that they need larger samples. More risk for the local population. Stop this imbecilic pursuit. They wan...

Trump is to gut the labs.

The budget has a 20% decrease to DOE office of science, 20% cut to NIH. NASA also gets a cut. This will  have a huge negative effect on the lab. Crazy, juts crazy. He also wants to cut NEA and PBS, this may not seem like  a big deal but they get very little money and do great things.

Rumor corner

LLNS may have excluded the wrong people in last VSSOP? The exclusions were based on outdated job categories and related skills. ULM are now thinking that in the future, job categories and functional areas will have to be re-defined. The next VSSOP/ISP will be based on the new categories and functional areas. The questions I have are: 1) Why didnt they think of that before the transition. It seems like their style is “change things as you go”. Planning is out the window! 2) Who will give input on the new changes? The next RIF apparently is going to be more lucrative than the VSSOP. Depending on the length of employment, a RIFed person, not only gets their 1 week pay per year of service but also from 30 to 120 days notice, essentially 30 to 120 days pay. Please feel free to comment on the rumors or add new ones you actually heard.