Skip to main content

Remember her statement?

We did it. Today is the first day of our new contract under the management of Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC.

When we stood up the transition team in May 2006, my team agreed on three important measures of success:

We would transition people, programs and processes without adverse effect on safety, security or programmatic deliverables.

We would lead our colleagues through the transition and engage the workforce in embracing our collective future.

We would establish disciplined and responsive communications with the workforce, the Laboratory Site Office. and the incoming M&Ocontractor. I am very proud to say that we measured up.

There are so many people who ensured the transition went as smoothly as possible in a period of unprecedented change for our Laboratory. Thanks go not only to my team and the many employees who supported them, but also to the team at the University of California Office of the President who worked closely with us throughout the transition to sort through benefits, contracts, communications and legal issues and to the Laboratory Site Office who helped identify and resolve issues dealing with changing from a public to a private entity. And of course I am forever grateful to have had the pleasure of working with Tom Gioconda and his LLNS transition team, which led us to the finish line.

Transitioning a contract that has been in place for 55 years is a very challenging task at best and I can't imagine what it would have been like without Tom at the helm.My deepest appreciation goes to my team, which worked many, many long, hard hours for 18 months identifying, debating and resolving every detail needed to ensure a smooth transition. I'm proud to have worked with the Laboratory's communication team who created multiple communication venues and documented, recorded and shared our progress with the workforce, providing factual information as quickly as it became available.

And on a very personal note, I want to give a very special thank you to Kathy Cruz-Glasgow, my deputy, and Sharon Bertram, myadministrator, who stood by me through it all, keeping me sane and on track, allowing me the space to express my own issues and concerns and encouraging me forward. They also took on an enormous workload working the logistics for the LLNS team, supporting the frequently asked questions efforts, and maintaining transition records.

It's with an odd sadness I say goodbye to you as transition manager. This assignment has been challenging, frustrating and stressful, butmost importantly rewarding. I'm honored that Director George Miller asked me to take on this task, and I take personal pride in knowing I contributed to helping us all through this part of the formal transition. And now the real transition begins.

I ask you to join me in moving forward as we adjust to the change together and prepare for the opportunities and challenges that lie ahead. I do believe asGeorge so often tells us, we have a bright future our outstanding workforce ensures us of that.

Comments

Anonymous said…
Oh so well. Here are just a few examples of cut and paste answers the employees got.

Question Id#1684 published on 8/25/2007 7:40:15 PM

Q: Since no new hires may enter TCP1, how does LLNS prevent the early retirees from draining the fund before the later retirees can retire?

A: We suggest you read (name removed )excellent column in the August 24 edition of Newsline. We believe her column covers the issues that the LLNL employees are most concerned with. Thank you for your patience in awaiting a response.

Question Id#2581 published on 8/25/2007 7:36:18 PM

Q: If LLNS were to declare bankruptcy sometime in the future, what specifically would happen to the TCP-1 retirement plan?

A: We suggest you read ( name removed ) excellent column in the August 24 edition of Newsline. We believe her column covers the issues that the LLNL employees are most concerned with. Thank you for your patience in awaiting a response.

Question Id#3184 published on 8/25/2007 3:54:09 PM

Q: Will TCP1 pension fund be insured by the Pension Benefit Guarantee Corporation (PBGC)?

A: We suggest you read (name removed ) excellent column in the August 24 edition of Newsline. We believe her column covers the issues that the LLNL employees are most concerned with. Thank you for your patience in awaiting a response.

Question Id#3440 published on 8/25/2007 3:47:52 PM

Q: What happens to TCP-1 if NNSA and DOE are disolved by the next or any furture administration. This is critical since we have already had one President of the United States that wanted to do this.

A: We suggest you read ( name removed ) excellent column in the August 24 edition of Newsline. We believe her column covers the issues that the LLNL employees are most concerned with.
Anonymous said…
Even Sauron had a spokes-critter.

Popular posts from this blog

Plutonium Shots on NIF.

Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises to pursue such stupid ideas as doing Plutonium experiments on NIF. The stupidity arises from the fact that a huge population is placed at risk in the short and long term. Why do this kind of experiment in a heavily populated area? Only a moron would push that kind of imbecile area. Do it somewhere else in the god forsaken hills of Los Alamos. Why should the communities in the Bay Area be subjected to such increased risk just because the lab's NIF has failed twice and is trying the Hail Mary pass of doing an SNM experiment just to justify their existence? Those Laser EoS techniques and the people analyzing the raw data are all just BAD anyways. You know what comes next after they do the experiment. They'll figure out that they need larger samples. More risk for the local population. Stop this imbecilic pursuit. They wan...

Trump is to gut the labs.

The budget has a 20% decrease to DOE office of science, 20% cut to NIH. NASA also gets a cut. This will  have a huge negative effect on the lab. Crazy, juts crazy. He also wants to cut NEA and PBS, this may not seem like  a big deal but they get very little money and do great things.

LLNL un-diversity

Actual post from Dec. 15 from one of the streams. This is a real topic. As far as promoting women and minorities even if their qualifications are not as good as the white male scientists, I am all for it. We need diversity at the lab and if that is what it takes, so be it.  Quit your whining. Look around the lab, what do you see? White male geezers. How many African Americans do you see at the lab? Virtually none. LLNL is one of the MOST undiverse places you will see. Face it folks, LLNL is an institution of white male privilege and they don't want to give up their privileged positions. California, a state of majority Hispanics has the "crown jewel" LLNL nestled in the middle of it with very FEW Hispanics at all!