Skip to main content

2014 fellows of the American Physical Society

2014 fellows of the American Physical Society were announced recently.

Here a count from DOE labs...

LLNL - 10
LBNL - 9
LANL - 9
Argonne - 5
Brookhaven - 3
Fermi - 3
PNNL - 3
Jeff Lab - 2
ORNL - 2
SLAC - 1
SNL - 1

Comments

Anonymous said…
Yea I mentioned this last year and they worked on it this year. Check last year as it tells a different story.
Anonymous said…
Fellowships for the labs are 100% politics, which vary from year to year. This was a good year for LLNL, others were not so good.
Anonymous said…
"Fellowships for the labs are 100% politics, "

Everything is political so what is your point?
Anonymous said…
To make your veins bulge, angry man.
Anonymous said…
I startling fact is that Sandia National Laboratories just received one 2014 fellows. I know, I know SNL is the Engineering Lab. Oh, BS I worked there, they are a Physics Lab "wanna be".
Anonymous said…
Their time will come. Probably next year, after a certain someone complains that SNL is under-represented.
Anonymous said…
Sandia came in last probably because three Vice Presidents of technical divisions at Sandia National Laboratories do not have a Ph.D.: Hruby, Walker, Vahle. To my knowledge, these are the first ever Vice Presidents without a Ph.D. in Science or Engineering to lead techical divisions at Sandia.

Adam Rowen (manager of the Materials Chemistry department) from Sandia National Laboratories does not have a Ph.D.
Anonymous said…
Irrelevant to anything except your twisted obsession.
Anonymous said…
APS fellowships are based on what happened 10-20 years ago.

Yeah, LLNL was winning 20 years ago. Not anymore.

Expect that list to turn upside down over the next 10-20 years.

Popular posts from this blog

Plutonium Shots on NIF.

Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises to pursue such stupid ideas as doing Plutonium experiments on NIF. The stupidity arises from the fact that a huge population is placed at risk in the short and long term. Why do this kind of experiment in a heavily populated area? Only a moron would push that kind of imbecile area. Do it somewhere else in the god forsaken hills of Los Alamos. Why should the communities in the Bay Area be subjected to such increased risk just because the lab's NIF has failed twice and is trying the Hail Mary pass of doing an SNM experiment just to justify their existence? Those Laser EoS techniques and the people analyzing the raw data are all just BAD anyways. You know what comes next after they do the experiment. They'll figure out that they need larger samples. More risk for the local population. Stop this imbecilic pursuit. They wan...

Trump is to gut the labs.

The budget has a 20% decrease to DOE office of science, 20% cut to NIH. NASA also gets a cut. This will  have a huge negative effect on the lab. Crazy, juts crazy. He also wants to cut NEA and PBS, this may not seem like  a big deal but they get very little money and do great things.

LLNL un-diversity

Actual post from Dec. 15 from one of the streams. This is a real topic. As far as promoting women and minorities even if their qualifications are not as good as the white male scientists, I am all for it. We need diversity at the lab and if that is what it takes, so be it.  Quit your whining. Look around the lab, what do you see? White male geezers. How many African Americans do you see at the lab? Virtually none. LLNL is one of the MOST undiverse places you will see. Face it folks, LLNL is an institution of white male privilege and they don't want to give up their privileged positions. California, a state of majority Hispanics has the "crown jewel" LLNL nestled in the middle of it with very FEW Hispanics at all!