Skip to main content

The return of Tyler Pryzbylek

Tyler Pryzbylek was rehired by NNSA. Load the shotguns.

Comments

Anonymous said…
Gee, when will Capt'n Tom D'Agostino return, too?

D'Agostino was the sole person that NNSA used to determine the contract winner in the bidding contest which selected LANS as the contractor for LANL. Soon after that event, he moved up to the top position at NNSA.

After the LANL lab contract, Tom's BFF, Tyler Pryzbylek, was the sole person that NNSA used to select LLNS as the prime contractor for LLNL.

No committee or "peer review" was used in selecting the nuclear weapon lab contractors. Only the single vote of these two men was used. That, in and of itself, should have raised serious red flags with the GAO IG regarding the honest competition of federal lab contractor winners.

To see a slick lawyer like Tyler Pryzbylek now being allowed back into a lead position over at NNSA is very disheartening.


Tyler Przybylek said…
I am not being rehired by NNSA, not I have received any preferential treatment form NNSA on anything.

After my retirement in 2008 from govenrment service I didnot hold an executive position with any NNSA contractor.

Finally, I recognize that we have had disagreements in the past but I have never lied to any of you.
Anonymous said…
The previous posting was substantially equivalent to the truth
Anonymous said…
Tyler Pryzbylek personally caused great damage to both weapons laboratories.

His name lives in infamy in the weapons complex.

He is hated.

Popular posts from this blog

Plutonium Shots on NIF.

Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises to pursue such stupid ideas as doing Plutonium experiments on NIF. The stupidity arises from the fact that a huge population is placed at risk in the short and long term. Why do this kind of experiment in a heavily populated area? Only a moron would push that kind of imbecile area. Do it somewhere else in the god forsaken hills of Los Alamos. Why should the communities in the Bay Area be subjected to such increased risk just because the lab's NIF has failed twice and is trying the Hail Mary pass of doing an SNM experiment just to justify their existence? Those Laser EoS techniques and the people analyzing the raw data are all just BAD anyways. You know what comes next after they do the experiment. They'll figure out that they need larger samples. More risk for the local population. Stop this imbecilic pursuit. They wan...

Trump is to gut the labs.

The budget has a 20% decrease to DOE office of science, 20% cut to NIH. NASA also gets a cut. This will  have a huge negative effect on the lab. Crazy, juts crazy. He also wants to cut NEA and PBS, this may not seem like  a big deal but they get very little money and do great things.

LLNL un-diversity

Actual post from Dec. 15 from one of the streams. This is a real topic. As far as promoting women and minorities even if their qualifications are not as good as the white male scientists, I am all for it. We need diversity at the lab and if that is what it takes, so be it.  Quit your whining. Look around the lab, what do you see? White male geezers. How many African Americans do you see at the lab? Virtually none. LLNL is one of the MOST undiverse places you will see. Face it folks, LLNL is an institution of white male privilege and they don't want to give up their privileged positions. California, a state of majority Hispanics has the "crown jewel" LLNL nestled in the middle of it with very FEW Hispanics at all!