Skip to main content

LANS makes the #1 slot for the company with the worst corporate integrity

LANS makes the #1 slot for the company with the worst corporate integrity in the story below. It involves the James E. Doyle case in which even the DOE bureaucracy could no longer stomach the sleazy activities and back-stabbing efforts of LANS executives!

Heckavajob, Charlie! Bonuses for all the LANS managers for this new lab "achievement":

--------------------

The Center's best national security stories from 2014

#1. What happens when a nuclear weapons lab employee criticizes the nuclear arms race?

In 2013, former nuclear policy specialist James E. Doyle published an article criticizing the nuclear arms race and defending President Obama's nuclear-free goals. Information in the article, which was reviewed and declared unclassified by Los Alamos National Laboratory, where Doyle worked, has since been declared classified, used to dock Doyle's pay and eventually cost Doyle his job. Experts, including a senior Department official, harbor suspicions that the classification was used to punish Doyle for his critique.

The Center for Public Integrity - Jan 1st, 2015
--------------------

www.publicintegrity.org/2015/01/01/16560/national-security-findings-you-may-have-missed

Integrity? LANS doesn't know the meaning of the word.

Comments

Anonymous said…
Wasn't Wallace supposed to be leading this goat rope? What happened?
Anonymous said…
Sargent Shultz.
Anonymous said…
Wasn't Wallace supposed to be leading this goat rope? What happened?

January 7, 2015 at 12:55 PM


This Wallace you speak of,..he the one who solved WHIP, the one who made Klipinger a lab fellow, he who became lab director, than leader of America, followed by Master of the Universe. Is this the Wallace? Wallace be praised!
Anonymous said…
The same Terry Wallace who once bragged about how he was going to get his fancy Science Complex of new offices built to replace outdated offices in S&T... and he never delivered.

Like his beloved "MARIE", it dies a slow death.
Anonymous said…
Does not compute Will Robinson..... Wallace supported Jackie K for LF? Woohoo. Not. Think you need to revise your history Sherlock.

And if that was tongue-in-cheek, those difficulties could not have possibly been used as an evaluation criterion/criteria for LF. Ok, back to my regularly scheduled program.....
Anonymous said…
Looks like LANL is going to have to "cough up" money and settle out of court. Happens all the time at LANL It also figures that Scott Gibbs had his hand in this. Gibbs was a highly incompetent AD. There are lots of folks in the weapon program that "got forced out of their jobs" because Gibbs could not hire people to fill nuclear facility positions. This move was an abysmal failure.

Popular posts from this blog

Plutonium Shots on NIF.

Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises to pursue such stupid ideas as doing Plutonium experiments on NIF. The stupidity arises from the fact that a huge population is placed at risk in the short and long term. Why do this kind of experiment in a heavily populated area? Only a moron would push that kind of imbecile area. Do it somewhere else in the god forsaken hills of Los Alamos. Why should the communities in the Bay Area be subjected to such increased risk just because the lab's NIF has failed twice and is trying the Hail Mary pass of doing an SNM experiment just to justify their existence? Those Laser EoS techniques and the people analyzing the raw data are all just BAD anyways. You know what comes next after they do the experiment. They'll figure out that they need larger samples. More risk for the local population. Stop this imbecilic pursuit. They wan...

Trump is to gut the labs.

The budget has a 20% decrease to DOE office of science, 20% cut to NIH. NASA also gets a cut. This will  have a huge negative effect on the lab. Crazy, juts crazy. He also wants to cut NEA and PBS, this may not seem like  a big deal but they get very little money and do great things.

LLNL un-diversity

Actual post from Dec. 15 from one of the streams. This is a real topic. As far as promoting women and minorities even if their qualifications are not as good as the white male scientists, I am all for it. We need diversity at the lab and if that is what it takes, so be it.  Quit your whining. Look around the lab, what do you see? White male geezers. How many African Americans do you see at the lab? Virtually none. LLNL is one of the MOST undiverse places you will see. Face it folks, LLNL is an institution of white male privilege and they don't want to give up their privileged positions. California, a state of majority Hispanics has the "crown jewel" LLNL nestled in the middle of it with very FEW Hispanics at all!