Blog purpose
This BLOG is for LLNL present and past employees, friends of LLNL and anyone impacted by the privatization of the Lab to express their opinions and expose the waste, wrongdoing and any kind of injustice against employees and taxpayers by LLNS/DOE/NNSA.
The opinions stated are personal opinions. Therefore,
The BLOG author may or may not agree with them before making the decision to post them.
Comments not conforming to BLOG rules are deleted.
Blog author serves as a moderator.
For new topics or suggestions, email jlscoob5@gmail.com
Blog rules
- Stay on topic.
- No profanity, threatening language, pornography.
- NO NAME CALLING.
- No political debate.
- Posts and comments are posted several times a day.
Tuesday, May 15, 2012
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Posts you viewed tbe most last 30 days
-
No comment. https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technology/goodbye-to-several-federal-jobs-these-are-the-jobs-elon-musk-has-said-will-be-cut/a...
-
If the Department of Energy (DOE) were eliminated, nuclear waste management in the U.S. would face significant challenges. The DOE is resp...
-
The end of LANL and LLNL? "After host Maria Bartiromo questioned whether the two plan to “close down entire agencies,” Ramaswamy said...
9 comments:
The downsizing continues. There is no future in working with nuclear weapons. Even the former head of STRATCOM seems to have understood this simply concept.
The downsizing continues. There is no future in working with nuclear weapons. Even the former head of STRATCOM seems to have understood this simply concept.
May 16, 2012 10:46 PM
Big deal! Bret Knapp understood no requirement for nuclear weapons when he started "wiping out" nuclear weapon expertise and capability 5-years ago at LANS. The only capability he didn't wipe out were those goals tied to PBIs, like hydrotests, which he gets a $20,000 bonus for each one that is fired. Knapp is a genius.
N = 2
In light of this it will be very hard for the NNSA to argue for larger weapons budgets in a poor economy. The support from DoD for larger weapons budgets may be in the past.
LLNL may get through the tight budget times if Parney can find more than weapons for a steady program.
Due to some poor choices, LANL does not look to have as bright a future.
Due to some poor choices, LANL does not look to have as bright a future.
May 22, 2012 5:38 PM
Bingo, we have a winner! LANL is going to be repeatedly downsized and is about to become "Rocky Flats II".
There is little support in the New Mexico Congressional delegation for LANL. St. Pete is long gone. They'll continue to support their "good" lab, SNL, and let LANL slowly twist in the wind.
Bingo, we have a winner! LANL is going to be repeatedly downsized and is about to become "Rocky Flats II".
May 23, 2012 9:19 PM
Los Alamos is "Rocky Flats II". Come on out to Area G where former Rocky Flats (and Savannah River) employees and managers are running the place. Things are so hectic that rules and policies are being broken to move the TRU waste. If things stay on this path, it won't be long before the FBI come in through the gates with M-16s and billy clubs to shut this place down.
The protective force has bigger guns.
The protective force has bigger guns.
May 25, 2012 7:27 PM
They may have bigger guns but they will hand them to the FBI like the French did when the Nazi's invaded.
Nazis indeed. Good analogy.
Post a Comment