Skip to main content

Outsourcing America

So ULM still denies that anything at LLNL is going to be outsourced. Do the people of LLNL understand what Russo's job is and has been for years. Just watch everything under his command get axed. Do you think we can catch ULM in another lie same as we did with the information given to use during the transitions that made people think everything was going to be the same. NOT !

Link here

Comments

Anonymous said…
Cannot say I recall anyone promising no outsourcing. The food service staff is already outsourced. Likewise many building maintenance projects. It can be entirely appropriate. Sandia has outsourced their security force for decades. Heck, the entire notion of the national labs is to tap into expertise not directly employed by the Federal government. Want to go onto the GS-xx pay scale?
Anonymous said…
Yeah, gimme a gubmint job. Then, at least, I could transfer somewhere else with preference.
Anonymous said…
Where were you during the Q & A trabsition period:

Question Id#240 published on 8/25/2007 4:52:48 PM

Q: 1. If sometime in the future LLNS loses the contract to manage LLNL, what will happen to the pensions of those who retire from LLNS? 2. If sometime in the future LLNS were to lose the contract to manage LLNL, would LLNS be dissolved? 3. If a workforce reduction were to become necessary, and a transferring, vested employee were to be laid off, what will happen to the pension money that LLNS receives from UCRP on behalf of that transferring employee? 4. In the event of a workforce reduction, would transferring, vested employees be more likely to be laid off due to their higher overhead costs to LLNS?

A: 1. If LLNS no longer has the contract, history of DOE sites tells you that the successor contractor assumes the program. 2. LLNS, LLC exists solely for the management and operations of the Livermore contract. 3. George Miller stated in his Town Hall on May 30th that he has no plans for layoffs or outsourcing, but to address your scenario the investment you have in the pension remains with the employee. 4. Again, there are no plans for layoffs, but critical mission skills are the core of lab hiring and not pension relationships.
Anonymous said…
Question Id#2824 published on 8/16/2007 10:00:29 AM Q: If in the event of a layoff in the future, would it be based on which retirement package you chose (?) or seniority?

A: George Miller stated in his May 30th Town Hall that he has no plans for layoffs or outsourcing. LLNS stands by that statement. Critical mission skills are what remains the core of lab hiring; pension relationships are not a factor.
Anonymous said…
Question Id#2486 published on 7/13/2007 12:46:30 PM Q: Strong rumor going around. We are hearing that there is going to be a RIF of 10% of the work force before Oct 1st. Mostly contract labor, post doc's and term employee's. True or False and if so again what are the facts?

A: False. LLNS has no such plans. In addition, George Miller stated in his Town Hall on May 30th that he has no plans for layoffs or outsourcing.
Anonymous said…
And then there is this many times over and over again:

Question Id#1034 published on 8/21/2007 12:08:39 PM

Q: What is the severance package offered by LLNS for involuntary layoffs, and how does it compare with the current LLNL / UC severance package? My understanding from colleagues at Los Alamos is that their severance package benefits were reduced for employees with many years seniority.

A: The current severance package is the same that is currently in place, which is 1 week of pay for each year of service, up to 26 weeks. However, LLNS has no plans to layoff people pending further budget decisions by the government.
Anonymous said…
Isn't it great how after close examination of a few thousand questions and answers which someone so graciously captured and made searchable, employees can begin to understand they were never told the truth during the Q & A period; and the Newsline was a media used to justify the ends. It's my hopes you realize if they'd have told you the truth it would have led to a mass exodus and a greater populated TCP-2 that in the end would have bankrupted the budget just to pay for the pension plan they've stolen. Would that have hurt my feelings any? Not one bit. I wish them well every day.

Popular posts from this blog

Plutonium Shots on NIF.

Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises to pursue such stupid ideas as doing Plutonium experiments on NIF. The stupidity arises from the fact that a huge population is placed at risk in the short and long term. Why do this kind of experiment in a heavily populated area? Only a moron would push that kind of imbecile area. Do it somewhere else in the god forsaken hills of Los Alamos. Why should the communities in the Bay Area be subjected to such increased risk just because the lab's NIF has failed twice and is trying the Hail Mary pass of doing an SNM experiment just to justify their existence? Those Laser EoS techniques and the people analyzing the raw data are all just BAD anyways. You know what comes next after they do the experiment. They'll figure out that they need larger samples. More risk for the local population. Stop this imbecilic pursuit. They wan...

Trump is to gut the labs.

The budget has a 20% decrease to DOE office of science, 20% cut to NIH. NASA also gets a cut. This will  have a huge negative effect on the lab. Crazy, juts crazy. He also wants to cut NEA and PBS, this may not seem like  a big deal but they get very little money and do great things.

LLNL un-diversity

Actual post from Dec. 15 from one of the streams. This is a real topic. As far as promoting women and minorities even if their qualifications are not as good as the white male scientists, I am all for it. We need diversity at the lab and if that is what it takes, so be it.  Quit your whining. Look around the lab, what do you see? White male geezers. How many African Americans do you see at the lab? Virtually none. LLNL is one of the MOST undiverse places you will see. Face it folks, LLNL is an institution of white male privilege and they don't want to give up their privileged positions. California, a state of majority Hispanics has the "crown jewel" LLNL nestled in the middle of it with very FEW Hispanics at all!