Blog purpose

This BLOG is for LLNL present and past employees, friends of LLNL and anyone impacted by the privatization of the Lab to express their opinions and expose the waste, wrongdoing and any kind of injustice against employees and taxpayers by LLNS/DOE/NNSA. The opinions stated are personal opinions. Therefore, The BLOG author may or may not agree with them before making the decision to post them. THIS BLOG WILL NOT POST ANY MAGA PROPAGANDA OR ANY MISINFORMATION REGARDLESS OF SOURCE. Comments not conforming to BLOG rules are deleted. Blog author serves as a moderator. For new topics or suggestions, email jlscoob5@gmail.com

Blog rules

  • Stay on topic.
  • No profanity, threatening language, pornography.
  • NO NAME CALLING.
  • No political debate.
  • Posts and comments are posted several times a day.

Monday, January 20, 2025

Can the labs get out of DOGE?

 Niw that trump is president:


What does it mean for the labs

Could the money be cut for DOGE,

Could the labs only focus on weapons

Would the labs work on ways to invade Greenland

Would all alternative energy research cease?

Would DEI be cut

Will strange new rules be implemented

6 comments:

Anonymous said...

Could the money be cut for DOGE,
- the money will be cut BY DOGE, not for them

Could the labs only focus on weapons
- that would waste expertise developed

Would the labs work on ways to invade Greenland
- OK, Silly question, do you think the military is going to blind them with NIF?

Would all alternative energy research cease?
- If it can be done better in the private sector it might go there. Develop the science at the lab and transfer it to the private sector.

Would DEI be cut
- The executive order is out, it dies a quick death

Will strange new rules be implemented
- Like merit based productivity, real science?

Anonymous said...

Honestly, if DOGE came into the labs and mandated a cut of 50% of managers and useless regulatory compliance and support staff, which is about 3/4 of the labs at this point, not only would cost go down but actual work output would soar. We all know this is the truth.

Anonymous said...

Los Alamos has always focused on weapons. Look at the yearly budget. It is silly to suggest there will be a change.

Anonymous said...

Greenland has large deposits of rare earth minerals, found in association with uranium, it could be extremely valuable:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kvanefjeld

Greenland's government has blocked development of this,

https://www.reuters.com/world/americas/greenland-bans-uranium-mining-halting-rare-earths-project-2021-11-10/

https://newint.org/mining/2025/greenland-being-held-ransom

https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20250121-the-enormous-challenge-of-mining-greenland

Anonymous said...

Whatever happens, it will not be good. The purpose of National Labs are for ground breaking research. A president who is anti-science and reactionary is going to do harm.

Anonymous said...

7:05 is absolutely correct. DOE and NNSA bureaucracy is legendary for its waste and outright stupidity. You could gut the Forrestal and area offices along with at least half of the managers in the DOE labs and not only would productivity soar, but morale would improve too.

Posts you viewed tbe most last 30 days