Skip to main content

Could This Be Our Situation

I think the current environment is not unlike that written by Ayn Rand in "Atlas Shrugged." Those that want to get something accomplished are being overwhelmed by those incapable of doing anything.

In the sea of Brownian motion that developed, the torpor was framed by the question: "Who is John Galt?"

Comments

Anonymous said…
"Those that want to get something accomplished are being overwhelmed by those incapable of doing anything."

I hope this was written to describe LLNS ULM and not the workers who actually want to do something other than weapons work.
Anonymous said…
In case any of you were wondering what the original poster was refering to.

Atlas_Shrugged
Anonymous said…
I think the original poster was referring to NNSA (or perhaps Congress) as being incapable of getting anything done. [Can anyone say "Hobson?"]

I think all employees, including their leadership, actually want to get things done for the country. Unfortunately, LLNL is being marginalized in the process....
Anonymous said…
Check the news....

A new laser system for Univ of Rochester

A new computer cluster for Oak Ridge

Two anchor organisations ( NIF and Comp/LC ) just got some serious competition with lots of DOE/NNSA bucks and officials praising the other guys.

You don't need a prophet to read the handwriting on this wall.
Anonymous said…
May 17, 2008 8:51 AM

NIF will probably come on-line as scheduled and will do a few shots to prove it was worth $4.5B - $5.5B what ever comes first and then it'll just go wayside and be forgotten. Once that happens in conjunction with no more weapon work and no more Pu on site I'd say LLNL should be closing the gates for good except for ULM who by that time will be rectal employees only from the business side. The crew to run a 24-7 shift at NIF will be entirely contract and on call. How long will this take. How about by the end 2014 or the end of the LLNS contract. If the employee of LLNL were smart they'd be planing to be unemployed or retired by the Oct 1st, 2014. That means their homes and cars need to be paid in full and they need to be out of debt entirely with their financing and life planed around what their retirement check will be. Better get those calculators out and base the outcome on a stock market that's to flat for decades to come and only getting a 2.5% return on their 401k and investments. That's as good as it's going to get. Wasn't having your UCRP jerked out from under you such a wonderful thing?
Anonymous said…
Of course the obvious comparison is James Taggart to George Miller! Scary when one thinks about it too much.
Anonymous said…
May 17, 2008 10:32 AM

I can't imagine NIF being the nations premier long term diagnostic equipment especially when its laser are out of date already, far to complicated in construction and in size. My understanding is smaller and more powerful lasers with faster rep rates are already in use elsewhere and could be used in place of these dinosaurs lasers currently in use. So what are we funding?
Anonymous said…
"dinosaur lasers"

Interesting. Never heard NIF described as being a dinosaur. Didn't they find dinosaur bones when excavating the work site? That should have been taken as an omen.
Anonymous said…
"So what are we funding?" - 11:58 AM

High paying welfare jobs, and little else. It was nice while it lasted, though, wasn't it?

Popular posts from this blog

Plutonium Shots on NIF.

Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises to pursue such stupid ideas as doing Plutonium experiments on NIF. The stupidity arises from the fact that a huge population is placed at risk in the short and long term. Why do this kind of experiment in a heavily populated area? Only a moron would push that kind of imbecile area. Do it somewhere else in the god forsaken hills of Los Alamos. Why should the communities in the Bay Area be subjected to such increased risk just because the lab's NIF has failed twice and is trying the Hail Mary pass of doing an SNM experiment just to justify their existence? Those Laser EoS techniques and the people analyzing the raw data are all just BAD anyways. You know what comes next after they do the experiment. They'll figure out that they need larger samples. More risk for the local population. Stop this imbecilic pursuit. They wan...

Trump is to gut the labs.

The budget has a 20% decrease to DOE office of science, 20% cut to NIH. NASA also gets a cut. This will  have a huge negative effect on the lab. Crazy, juts crazy. He also wants to cut NEA and PBS, this may not seem like  a big deal but they get very little money and do great things.

Why Workplace Jargon Is A Big Problem

From the Huffington Post Why Workplace Jargon Is A Big Problem http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/04/25/work-words_n_5159868.html?utm_hp_ref=business&ir=Business When we replace a specific task with a vague expression, we grant the task more magnitude than it deserves. If we don't describe an activity plainly, it seems less like an easily achievable goal and more like a cloudy state of existence that fills unknowable amounts of time. A fog of fast and empty language has seeped into the workplace. I say it's time we air it out, making room for simple, concrete words, and, therefore, more deliberate actions. By striking the following 26 words from your speech, I think you'll find that you're not quite as overwhelmed as you thought you were. Count the number that LLNLs mangers use.  touch base circle back bandwidth - impactful - utilize - table the discussion deep dive - engagement - viral value-add - one-sheet deliverable - work product - incentivise - take it to the ...