Skip to main content

Where was LLNL?


Post anon, please

You too can have a car that goes 200 miles on one charge for $109,000 with $60,000 down before production and a four month lead time. As far as I'm concerned LLNL's been working on the wrong answers to everything forever it seem like. Maybe if the directors of the past would have had a little foresight these cars would only cost about $20,000 fully loaded and everyone could own one. Maybe we wouldn't be dependent on oil every again and the middle east would still be a worthless desert of rolling dunes for the q-tip and camels to play in.
But here is what we have instead:

The world’s demand for oil has increased sharply in recent years, rising from 77 million barrels per day in 2001 to 85 million barrels per day in 2007. The U.S. Energy Information Administration expects world oil consumption to grow by 1.2 million barrels a day in 2008 and by 1.3 million barrels a day in 2009. Non-OECD countries are projected to account for 1.1 million barrels per day of world consumption growth in 2008, with gains concentrated in China, the Middle East oil-producing countries, India, and other Asian countries. What we have now are punks as those seen in the picture ruling your lives. Click on the picture if you want to know "The Truth About Oil and Gasoline: An API Primer"

200 Miles On A Single Charge

Comments

Anonymous said…
The cure for higher oil prices:

The cure:

A USMC sniper was real good at his job. This sniper had a method. He would yell out some insult at the enemy and when someone stood up to reply, Bang! One less insurgent!

After every mission the Company Commander would ask "How many insurgents have you shot today?"

On this particular day when asked about the number killed, he reported "Five killed and I let one go."

"Let one go?" roared the Company Commander. "What do you mean, you let one go?"

"Well, I yelled out 'Osama is a Homo!'

Then this big insurgent stood up and yelled 'Hillary is a B****!'

I just couldn't shoot a fellow Republican!"
Anonymous said…
Crude To Go Up,Up,Up and so will the price at the pump. Hang on snoopy and dig real, real deep into your pockets and livelihood.

Posted on Sat, May. 17, 2008

Analysis: Saudis protect own interests in oil production

By H. JOSEF HEBERT Associated Press Writer
last updated: May 17, 2008 08:06:31 AM

WASHINGTON

When President Bush, once a Texas oilman, asked Saudi Arabia to pump more crude, he may have forgotten that the Saudis have a long memory. And that made it a good bet his mission this past week would produce a dry hole.

In the 1990s the OPEC cartel was eager to pump more oil in a grab for cash as prices - like today - were going up, passing what then was viewed as a healthy sum in the $20-plus range. But then the Asia economic crisis struck and oil prices plummeted to below $10 a barrel.

Saudi Arabia and other producers got burned.

"They remember that and they're not going have that happen again," says Robert Ebel, an international energy expert at the Center for Strategic and International Studies. "They understand the market just as well as we do."

This time Bush in his trip to Riyadh and his private meetings with Saudi King Abdullah walked away with a trickle of oil, but nowhere near a gusher.

Timing the announcement with the president's visit, the Saudis said they would pump an additional 300,000 barrels of crude next month. They also made a point that the decision had been made a week ago, and not in response to Bush's visit.

Energy analysts saw it as a token, and, in fact, oil markets responded by boosting prices a few more dollars to $126 a barrel.

A dozen years ago OPEC, led by the Saudis, were more likely to loosen their oil spigots, often cheating on the oil cartel's self-imposed quotas. Today their primary goal is keep the supply and demand in close balance - and guard against prices tanking.

So when Bush made his second personal appeal this year to King Abdullah in search of ways to ease the pain for American motorists from soaring gasoline costs, the Saudis told him there's plenty of oil already available. The additional 300,000 barrels - bringing Saudi Arabia production to 9.4 million barrels a day - was simply to meet customer needs in June, officials explained.

Saudi oil minister Ali al-Naimi scolded those "who are questioning our oil practices and policies." Saudi officials also have reminded U.S. officials that they're increasing their capacity to produce more oil, now about 11.8 million barrels a day, but of course that doesn't bring any more actual oil onto the market.
Bush may not have agreed, but despite his close personal relationship with King Abdullah, he wasn't going to get anything close to what he sought. For the Saudis this is pure business.

Eight years ago when Bush was running for president and the Clinton administration was trying to pry more oil out of OPEC the future president said that as a former oilman he would "jawbone" the producers and get them to "open their spigots."

Bill Richardson, now the governor of New Mexico and then energy secretary, says he jawboned as best he could and "on several occasions they increased production and the price actually went down."

"They hated to see me coming, but they listened," said Richardson, adding that the Saudis and other OPEC countries "aren't terribly concerned about high prices."
While Bush promised he would jawbone, said Richardson, "he never did it. ... He never jawbones."

Ebel, a longtime international energy analyst, calls all the rhetoric about jawboning OPEC "political talk" to mask a simple fact: there's little that oil-consuming nations - even the world's biggest - can do to force OPEC to produce more oil if they don't think it's in their interest.

"I don't think you can go over there, knock on the door with your hand out and say, 'I want more oil.' It's not going to happen," says Ebel.

Energy Secretary Samuel Bodman knows about that. He's traveled to meet with the oil sheiks a number of times, but he acknowledges the limits of his influence.

Bodman put it this way when asked by members of Congress last November why he can't get OPEC to pump more oil: "I certainly have made my views known. Whether they respond or choose to respond is up to them and not up to me. I'm doing the best I can within the limited sets of options that we have."

Bernard Picchi, senior energy analyst at Wall Street Access, an independent research firm, says the Saudis also have to "walk a fine line" between behaving as a good ally to the United States, their biggest customer, and alienating other OPEC members.

"They played nice with us two years ago and did increase production going into the jaws of the heating season, and overproduced," recalls Picchi. But in the spring demand dropped and oil prices fell.

"A lot of people within OPEC blamed (the Saudis) of succumbing to U.S. pressure," said Picchi.

EDITOR'S NOTE - H. Josef Hebert has covered energy and environmental policy since 1990.
Anonymous said…
Diesel up .30 cents in 2 days. I cant afford to drive in anymore. I get over 50 mpg ...but at 4.90 a gallon.

Milk 4.60 gal
fish avg. 6.99 lbs
beef ground 3.99 lbs
WTF ....

The price of diesel and gas are now taking a toll on all of us.

Bend over and take it like a good little ?

Popular posts from this blog

Plutonium Shots on NIF.

Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises to pursue such stupid ideas as doing Plutonium experiments on NIF. The stupidity arises from the fact that a huge population is placed at risk in the short and long term. Why do this kind of experiment in a heavily populated area? Only a moron would push that kind of imbecile area. Do it somewhere else in the god forsaken hills of Los Alamos. Why should the communities in the Bay Area be subjected to such increased risk just because the lab's NIF has failed twice and is trying the Hail Mary pass of doing an SNM experiment just to justify their existence? Those Laser EoS techniques and the people analyzing the raw data are all just BAD anyways. You know what comes next after they do the experiment. They'll figure out that they need larger samples. More risk for the local population. Stop this imbecilic pursuit. They wan...

Trump is to gut the labs.

The budget has a 20% decrease to DOE office of science, 20% cut to NIH. NASA also gets a cut. This will  have a huge negative effect on the lab. Crazy, juts crazy. He also wants to cut NEA and PBS, this may not seem like  a big deal but they get very little money and do great things.

LLNL un-diversity

Actual post from Dec. 15 from one of the streams. This is a real topic. As far as promoting women and minorities even if their qualifications are not as good as the white male scientists, I am all for it. We need diversity at the lab and if that is what it takes, so be it.  Quit your whining. Look around the lab, what do you see? White male geezers. How many African Americans do you see at the lab? Virtually none. LLNL is one of the MOST undiverse places you will see. Face it folks, LLNL is an institution of white male privilege and they don't want to give up their privileged positions. California, a state of majority Hispanics has the "crown jewel" LLNL nestled in the middle of it with very FEW Hispanics at all!