Bait and Switch
When Seniority Means Management's Choice
Bruce Kelly, SPSE-UPTE President-elect
SPSE-UPTE has been getting comments from employees, and I have seen comments on the blogs, along the lines of “if I had only been told about … I would have made a different decision.” These comments have been centered on making a different choice of retirement options if they knew a big layoff was coming. Those who chose TCP 1 (Total Compensation Package 1), but are not vested, will receive no retirement benefits if they are laid off. Now we expect similar discussions about taking the VSSOP if they had known LLNS was going to change layoff units between the voluntary and involuntary programs.
If you wonder what a layoff unit is, it is mentioned in the Lab’s Personnel Policies and Procedures Manual. Recently, LLNS has been using the euphemism of “business unit”. That change of wording goes a long way in trying to figure out why management has picked certain business units that don’t seem to have anything to do with business. That is because they have everything to do with layoffs.
Lab policy also prominently mentions seniority as a factor in determining order of layoff. If you had a complete perspective on management’s process, you’d see employees grouped first by Directorate, then by layoff unit, then by Skills/Knowledge/Ability (SKA) value, then there will probably only be two people that will have to worry about using seniority as a tie breaker. SKA value is either your four digit job code or a score given by management to 200 series employees. All of these little differences in what LLNS says and what is happening remind us of typical bait and switch advertising techniques.
I have also noticed some comments like “why isn't SPSE-UPTE doing something about this?” Here is my answer to that: what planet have you been vacationing on for the last couple of years? What we have been saying over and over again I will not repeat here, but seriously, getting some control in this situation is what collective bargaining is all about. It is a process whereby management and employees sit down and mutually decide what conditions they will work under. Neither side can wave a magic wand and say it shall be thus. There is nothing illegal about layoffs in and of themselves. The only thing that might be illegal is the effects of a layoff, which can only be mitigated after the fact. Management’s mishandling of the layoffs 35 years ago caused the formation of SPSE. We expect it will be just as bad this time around.
The major difference back then was that we could not get collective bargaining in the public sector and now collective bargaining is legally available to us regardless of being public or private employees. Another segment of the Lab has already taken advantage of this change, has organized and is currently bargaining with LLNS. One of the best ways to show your support for collective bargaining is to join SPSE-UPTE. To do so, go to our website at http://www.spse.org/, click on membership, and download, fill out, and submit a membership application.
Many of you probably think it is May 2008. You are wrong! It is May 1776 and you now have a choice to make. Either stand up for your rights or bow down to the kingdom of LLNS.
Forever!
Posts you viewed tbe most last 30 days
-
LGBT intolerance problem at Sandia? I was just checking glassdoor.com and noticed several comments suggesting intolerance to LGBT at Sandia...
-
So did you SSVSP and why? Give details.
-
So what do the NNSA labs do under the the 2nd Trump administration ? What are the odds we will have a test?
4 comments:
I am retired from what was formerly known as LLNL. I was a Security Police Officer. Not long ago the majority of the Security Police Officers, chose to form a union, because we felt we wanted more control over some important issues. As I recall the Lab and UC had spent millions of dollars, hired the most expensive law firms they fought us with everything they had, and used every threat that they could use.
We were criticized by many others and by members of our own department for organizing a union. We were told that the Lab and UC was a good place to work and that they would take care of there employees. I enjoyed working at the Lab and it was a good place to work. But we felt that the Lab and UC could do a little better at taking care of our Department. We wanted some control over our future, from those of whom had all the control.
I am sad to see what has happened to the Lab, so many people have been let go. And many more to come. Some times collectively we can make a difference . Security has managed to avoid any cuts. It comes down to trust and loyalty. There was no trust in UC or the Labs loyalty. We trusted only
in our self's. I hope that something can be done to stop all this madness, I have many good friends that have been affected by all of this. The ones that had all the control have failed so many loyal employees, who thought that they would be taken care of.
Since there are no real men left in this USA and we are now a nation that looks more like Europe this statement means nothing.
"Many of you probably think it is May 2008. You are wrong! It is May 1776 and you now have a choice to make. Either stand up for your rights or bow down to the kingdom of LLNS."
The people of the USA will never take up arms against their beloved goverment and begin a restructing process. WE are truly divided and that is what it take to have control of the people and do as you wish.
If everyone stood up and said "enough is enough" and just left - LLNS would be screwed. Collective bargaining should be done at national level not one company at a time. No company should be allowed to mis-treat its workers. Punish them for it and protect everyone in every job. JUST LEAVE. Walk out of the door. Get another job. This place sucks!
Leave LLNL - form your own company and compete for projects.
Post a Comment