Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Posts you viewed tbe most last 30 days
-
LGBT intolerance problem at Sandia? I was just checking glassdoor.com and noticed several comments suggesting intolerance to LGBT at Sandia...
-
So did you SSVSP and why? Give details.
-
So what do the NNSA labs do under the the 2nd Trump administration ? What are the odds we will have a test?
2 comments:
I doubt it. The beneficiaries of the TCP-1 plan are promised a future payment that does not depend on the performance of the fund (unless it fails). Whether it has 110% or 140% more than liabilities has no impact on the beneficiary.
I guess, now that I think about it, having a 110% vs. 85% funded plan may mean the difference between substantial employee contributions or none. If enough decision makers eliminated people in TCP-1 from getting benefits to improve their own financial situation this might be malfeasance.
But I doubt it, No doubt the senior decision makers get a bonus in part based on how much they control costs through layoffs. So it is unfortunaltely a reality that managers are by design supposed to take advantage of their employees. Another reason LLNS was a bad idea for the taxpayer.
no the tcp-1 people that are still at llnl did not improve thier pension pay out one cent ! if you sheepeople had bothered to read the orignal rfp and white papers for the contract you would have notice a clause stating that doe gets keep all monies that are left over after the last payment is made to the last retiree. bend over doe and nnsa is driving the train!!!!!
10 BEAM
Post a Comment