This BLOG is for LLNL present and past employees, friends of LLNL and anyone impacted by the privatization of the Lab to express their opinions and expose the waste, wrongdoing and any kind of injustice against employees and taxpayers by LLNS/DOE/NNSA.
The opinions stated are personal opinions. Therefore,
The BLOG author may or may not agree with them before making the decision to post them.
THIS BLOG WILL NOT POST ANY MAGA PROPAGANDA OR ANY MISINFORMATION REGARDLESS OF SOURCE.
Comments not conforming to BLOG rules are deleted.
Blog author serves as a moderator.
For new topics or suggestions, email jlscoob5@gmail.com
Blog rules
Stay on topic.
No profanity, threatening language, pornography.
NO NAME CALLING.
No political debate.
Posts and comments are posted several times a day.
Thursday, July 31, 2008
Any SPSE news?
Anonymously asked:
What was the outcome of the SPSE meeting for people who were laid off? What there a basis for action?
4 comments:
Anonymous
said...
My take: there were enough 'stories' discussed about the improprieties of the layoff that the over 40 folks probably will have a case for age discrimination. Not sure about others.
Law firm was collecting data to see if their is a case. Next step is for them to discuss with others and if they decide to take case, they will convene again with only those who requested using their services in a suite.
Judging from the array of people I saw in attendance LLNS had their heads in a southerly region of their anatomy on this one. There are definitely grounds for unlawful termination on several counts. This type of behavior is what they warn employers not to do.
At least one thing I noticed that the attorneys didn't tell the truth about--they said Lab arbitration only gets you reinstatement and backpay. If you read the policy it says you can get anything you could get in court, and the Lab pays for the hearing. If you read the papers this morning this is the same firm that just lost the case in the Supreme Court that they filed against the Lab. I'm going for a second opinion.
LLNS, NNSA nor DOE cares about any lawsuit. They have had funds set-aside in preparation to settle out of court OR dismiss the allegations. Disgusted!!
4 comments:
My take: there were enough 'stories' discussed about the improprieties of the layoff that the over 40 folks probably will have a case for age discrimination. Not sure about others.
Law firm was collecting data to see if their is a case. Next step is for them to discuss with others and if they decide to take case, they will convene again with only those who requested using their services in a suite.
Judging from the array of people I saw in attendance LLNS had their heads in a southerly region of their anatomy on this one. There are definitely grounds for unlawful termination on several counts. This type of behavior is what they warn employers not to do.
At least one thing I noticed that the attorneys didn't tell the truth about--they said Lab arbitration only gets you reinstatement and backpay. If you read the policy it says you can get anything you could get in court, and the Lab pays for the hearing.
If you read the papers this morning this is the same firm that just lost the case in the Supreme Court that they filed against the Lab. I'm going for a second opinion.
LLNS, NNSA nor DOE cares about any lawsuit. They have had funds set-aside in preparation to settle out of court OR dismiss the allegations. Disgusted!!
Post a Comment