Interesting news article on the recent cyber event at headquarters.
http://fcw.com/articles/2013/02/05/doe-data-breach.aspx?m=2
Blog purpose
This BLOG is for LLNL present and past employees, friends of LLNL and anyone impacted by the privatization of the Lab to express their opinions and expose the waste, wrongdoing and any kind of injustice against employees and taxpayers by LLNS/DOE/NNSA.
The opinions stated are personal opinions. Therefore,
The BLOG author may or may not agree with them before making the decision to post them.
Comments not conforming to BLOG rules are deleted.
Blog author serves as a moderator.
For new topics or suggestions, email jlscoob5@gmail.com
Blog rules
- Stay on topic.
- No profanity, threatening language, pornography.
- NO NAME CALLING.
- No political debate.
- Posts and comments are posted several times a day.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Posts you viewed tbe most last 30 days
-
So what do the NNSA labs do under the the 2nd Trump administration ? What are the odds we will have a test?
-
Do you remember how hard it was to get a Q clearance? You needed a good reputation, good credit and you couldn't lie about anything. We...
-
The end of LANL and LLNL? "After host Maria Bartiromo questioned whether the two plan to “close down entire agencies,” Ramaswamy said...
7 comments:
There's nothing in HQ worth knowing. Must have been Nigerian hackers.
Hey maybe the guys at DOE who read this blog clicked on the phishing link in one of the posts offering financial services. Readership from DOE and NNSA is at a fairly decent level.
It sounds like there is a cultural problem at DOE.
Those "buttheads & cowboys" over at DOE HQ need to be taught a lesson. Send in Pete Nanos!
Hmmm, all the NNSA labs got beat up by DOE HQ for not securing their laptops with whole disk encryption so all lab laptops had it installed years ago regardless of the classification of the data on those laptops. It was mandatory for everyone.
Meanwhile, back at DOE HQ where the bureaucrats love screaming at the labbies, they didn't bother to follow their own advice.
Figures, doesn't it?
"they didn't bother to follow their own advice.
February 8, 2013 at 8:42 PM"
It wasn't "advice" it was "policy" and they should be disiplined "up to and including termination" just as they mandate for the labbies who disregard policy.
What happens when the arrogant bureaucrats at DOE HQ disobey security policies? Nothing.
Post a Comment