Blog purpose

This BLOG is for LLNL present and past employees, friends of LLNL and anyone impacted by the privatization of the Lab to express their opinions and expose the waste, wrongdoing and any kind of injustice against employees and taxpayers by LLNS/DOE/NNSA. The opinions stated are personal opinions. Therefore, The BLOG author may or may not agree with them before making the decision to post them. Comments not conforming to BLOG rules are deleted. Blog author serves as a moderator. For new topics or suggestions, email jlscoob5@gmail.com

Blog rules

  • Stay on topic.
  • No profanity, threatening language, pornography.
  • NO NAME CALLING.
  • No political debate.
  • Posts and comments are posted several times a day.

Wednesday, February 13, 2013

Obama to Renew Drive for Cuts in Nuclear Arms

Only a fool can't see that Obama is planning for big cuts to the NNSA weapons labs. His nominee for the DoD, Chuck Hagel, is a member of Goal Zero and has a dislike for all things nuclear. The New York Times article below confirms suspicions of what's to come. :


Obama to Renew Drive for Cuts in Nuclear Arms

By DAVID E. SANGER
NY Times: February 10, 2013

WASHINGTON — President Obama will use his State of the Union speech on Tuesday to reinvigorate one of his signature national security objectives — drastically reducing nuclear arsenals around the world — after securing agreement in recent months with the United States military that the American nuclear force can be cut in size by roughly a third.

....But Mr. Obama is already moving quietly, officials acknowledge, to explore whether he can scale back a 10-year, $80 billion program to modernize the country’s weapons laboratories.

The White House agreed to the spending on the weapons labs as the price of winning Republican votes on the new Start three years ago, but one senior defense official said late last year that “the environment of looking for cuts in the national security budget makes this an obvious target.”

www.nytimes.com/2013/02/11/us/politics/ obama-to-renew-drive-for-cuts-in-nuclear -arms.html?_r=0

18 comments:

Anonymous said...

Anonymous said...


Well with the new North Korea test I think it is time to slash some NNSA budgets. 405

February 12, 2013 at 7:05 AM
Delete
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Yeah we need an arms race with a backwards pariah state like we need a hole in the head. Take the money out of the labs and put that money into conventional weaponry, satellites, and drone technology.

February 12, 2013 at 1:18 PM
Delete

Anonymous said...

To the Republican Senators who voted for START II based on the promises of Obama to increase funding for the decrepit and slowly dissolving capabilities of the US nuclear weapon labs.... SUCKERS !!!!!

Anonymous said...

There is no evidence that nuclear deterrence works. The Soviet Union is more powerful now than ever. The Soviet what, you say? What is that, you say?

Anonymous said...

That's right. Our programs will not deter proliferation. It will deter war. But NK has no incentive for launching a first strike anyways. They want to develop nuke tipped missiles to show off and stick it to international community. Maybe they will edge closer to threatening US allies once they have developed reliable long range nuclear strike capabilities.

Anonymous said...

Unlike Bill Clinton or John Kennedy, Barack Hussein Obama wouldn't be caught dead visiting one of America's nuclear weapons labs.

Sense the difference in these Dem. Presidents?

Anonymous said...

But NK has no incentive for launching a first strike anyways. They want to develop nuke tipped missiles to show off and stick it to international community.

February 15, 2013 at 11:41 AM

You are very naive. What NK wants to do with its capability is SELL IT. To the highest bidder, Al Quaida included. The recent test was the most latest episode of a very effective advertising campaign.

Anonymous said...

You are a moron for implying that there is a profit motive to NK developing nukes. give me a break. They will have to sell alot of them to break even. And AQ would not need to buy all that many anyways. The only "profits" are the returns to successful blackmailing of their enemies, and forcing sanctions to be lifted. The low oxygen levels from the high altitudes sure does have an adverse impact on your analytical abilities.

Anonymous said...

No real evidence to support a position, so you resort to ad hominum attacks. Yeah, that'll convince everyone you're right.

Anonymous said...

The 9:28 AM remark applies to BOTH 7:29 PM and to 1:27 AM? 1:27AM just copies the same structure and amplifies it. Disparagement or insult followed by unsupported position. Maybe it is the same person posting both, trying to present as two different people. I've seen more twisted behavior online. Wouldn't surprise me if this was the case.

Anonymous said...

9:28 AM is selectively labeling some posts, but none of his own, as ad hominem abuse when he can't even spell "ad hominem" correctly.

Anonymous said...

9:28 AM is selectively labeling some posts, but none of his own, as ad hominem abuse when he can't even spell "ad hominem" correctly.

February 18, 2013 at 1:02 AM

So the misspelling invalidates his point? Pot, meet kettle.

Anonymous said...

Oh the irony.

Anonymous said...

Kudos to 1:02 AM for the clever troll post. I will share this with my journalism students as they will appreciate the irony. 1:02 AM not only applies a prototypical ad hominem attack but also uses incorrect spelling of "ad hominem" as an invalidator. On top of that, it addresses and is in response to two previous ad hominem attack posts. Ad hominem attacks on 3 different levels. Very nicely set up. Bravo.

Anonymous said...

9:28AM is also an ad homimen attack, interestingly enough. The use the same illogic: 'They can't be right.. they just resort to ad hominem attacks.' These are back-to-back ad hominem attacks here. Hilarious.

Anonymous said...

9:28AM is also an ad homimen attack, interestingly enough. The use the same illogic: 'They can't be right.. they just resort to ad hominem attacks.' These are back-to-back ad hominem attacks here. Hilarious.

Anonymous said...

What drivel. No wonder NIF failed.

Anonymous said...

Enough with the nonstop ad hominem linguistic foreplay. Just get a room you two (or three or one.). We get the irony.

Anonymous said...

This is all a result of Obama and his violations of the US constitution.

Posts you viewed tbe most last 30 days