Blog purpose
This BLOG is for LLNL present and past employees, friends of LLNL and anyone impacted by the privatization of the Lab to express their opinions and expose the waste, wrongdoing and any kind of injustice against employees and taxpayers by LLNS/DOE/NNSA.
The opinions stated are personal opinions. Therefore,
The BLOG author may or may not agree with them before making the decision to post them.
Comments not conforming to BLOG rules are deleted.
Blog author serves as a moderator.
For new topics or suggestions, email jlscoob5@gmail.com
Blog rules
- Stay on topic.
- No profanity, threatening language, pornography.
- NO NAME CALLING.
- No political debate.
- Posts and comments are posted several times a day.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Posts you viewed tbe most last 30 days
-
Good article in Nature News on progress on Z with a mention of NIF's problems http://www.nature.com/news/triple-threat-method-sparks-h...
-
Actual post from Dec. 15 from one of the streams. This is a real topic. As far as promoting women and minorities even if their qualification...
-
" ...If there were damning factual evidence of anything untoward, it would obviously have been brought forward with great fanfare......
7 comments:
Big deal, the 1-year shutdown of PF-4 pales in comparison to the LANL Weapons Engineering Tritium Facility (WETF) which has been shutdown for at least 4-years. Another LANS failure they keep under the Bechtel dirty rug.
May 28, 2014 at 3:01 PM
You obviously have no clue about the ongoing plans for the US nuclear weapons stockpile.
Nor do you, NNSA, DOE,DOD, Congress, or POTUS!
Well you might read the stockpile planning documents to get educated, if you cared about facts.
There must have been a secret NNSA plan to ramp down lots of programs .... By putting Macmillan in charge... That's the way to do it. Put a modeller in charge of operations and experiments and the smart ones will flee in droves.
The bottom-line is that Brad Meyer (Grand Poupah for GTS) has stated in public that he does not need the Weapons Engineering Facility (WETF) any longer. So who needs it if he doesn't?
No one needs the WETF. Except for some semi-urgent problems a decade ago, no one ever did.
Post a Comment