Skip to main content

Non-profit mindset is good

Returning Los Alamos to Non-Profit Mindset Key to Big Triad Win, UC Exec Says

Excising the profit-seeking mindset from the Los Alamos National Laboratory was key to keeping the University of California on the storied nuclear-weapons lab’s management team, an executive with the massive public university system said Wednesday.

After about a dozen years under the for-profit Los Alamos National Security, the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) in June awarded a possibly decade-long Los Alamos management and operations contract to Triad National Security: a non-profit team including senior partners Battelle Memorial Institute, the University of California (UC), and Texas A&M University.

Los Alamos National Security includes senior partners UC and Bechtel, with BWX Technologies and AECOM. All but UC are for-profit companies. NNSA decided to pull the incumbent’s contract more than a decade after its final option period would have expired after a series of management and safety lapses at the lab.

The last straw for NNSA came in 2014, after a shoddily packaged barrel of nuclear waste from Los Alamos caused a small underground explosion and radiation leak that at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant — the Department of Energy’s only deep-underground repository for plutonium-contaminated material and equipment.

The disposal site shut down for almost three years after that, and by 2015, NNSA had decided to put the Los Alamos management and operations contract back on the street.

When that happened, UC immediately became convinced that “returning to a partnership amongst nonprofit organizations” was key to keeping some degree of control over the laboratory it helped build in 1943, and which it managed solo for most of the decades since, said Kim Budil, vice president for national laboratories at UC’s office of the president.

A nonprofit partnership “would commit to a shared fate, a shared sense of urgency about supporting the laboratory and ensuring its success, and a common set of values in how we pursue that,” Budil said Wednesday in a regents meeting webcast from San Francisco.

Budil framed Triad’s nonprofit core as “an equal partnership,” though the company’s president and chief executive officer, Thomas Mason, has a strong Battelle pedigree. Mason, who will be director at Los Alamos, comes to New Mexico after a decade as president and chief executive officer of Oak Ridge National Lab prime contractor UT-Battelle.

Outside Triad's main triumvirate are some for-profit entities, headlined by the nuclear-savvy Huntington Ingalls Industries/Stoller Newport News, and Fluor Federal Services.

“[W]e do understand the role that industrial practice plays in improving the operations at the laboratory, so we structured our LLC such that the private sector partners we brought in would be integrated subcontractors,” Budil said. "That does two things: it gives them the ability to see the success of the laboratory through our lens. They can’t locally optimize to their own parts of the laboratory because the ultimate decision goes through the LLC. So they’re full partners in the total success of the laboratory.”

Triad is set to take over Los Alamos Nov. 1. The company’s contract is worth around $20 billion over 10 years, with options. Total Triad fees could be as high as $50 million a year. Budil said UC would know exactly what its share of those fees will be by July 2019.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Plutonium Shots on NIF.

Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises to pursue such stupid ideas as doing Plutonium experiments on NIF. The stupidity arises from the fact that a huge population is placed at risk in the short and long term. Why do this kind of experiment in a heavily populated area? Only a moron would push that kind of imbecile area. Do it somewhere else in the god forsaken hills of Los Alamos. Why should the communities in the Bay Area be subjected to such increased risk just because the lab's NIF has failed twice and is trying the Hail Mary pass of doing an SNM experiment just to justify their existence? Those Laser EoS techniques and the people analyzing the raw data are all just BAD anyways. You know what comes next after they do the experiment. They'll figure out that they need larger samples. More risk for the local population. Stop this imbecilic pursuit. They wan...

Trump is to gut the labs.

The budget has a 20% decrease to DOE office of science, 20% cut to NIH. NASA also gets a cut. This will  have a huge negative effect on the lab. Crazy, juts crazy. He also wants to cut NEA and PBS, this may not seem like  a big deal but they get very little money and do great things.

Why Workplace Jargon Is A Big Problem

From the Huffington Post Why Workplace Jargon Is A Big Problem http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/04/25/work-words_n_5159868.html?utm_hp_ref=business&ir=Business When we replace a specific task with a vague expression, we grant the task more magnitude than it deserves. If we don't describe an activity plainly, it seems less like an easily achievable goal and more like a cloudy state of existence that fills unknowable amounts of time. A fog of fast and empty language has seeped into the workplace. I say it's time we air it out, making room for simple, concrete words, and, therefore, more deliberate actions. By striking the following 26 words from your speech, I think you'll find that you're not quite as overwhelmed as you thought you were. Count the number that LLNLs mangers use.  touch base circle back bandwidth - impactful - utilize - table the discussion deep dive - engagement - viral value-add - one-sheet deliverable - work product - incentivise - take it to the ...