Skip to main content

No Texas A&M involvement

Notable that there is zero Texas A&M involvement in the new organization leadership


https://www.ladailypost.com/content/triad-names-lanl-associate-directors-effective-nov-1-0

Comments

Anonymous said…
Not surprising since TAM has no direct involvement in any DOE or NNSA site operations. It is telling that the ALD for Business Management and ALD for Facilities & Operations are from Battelle run national labs - ORNL and PNNL. Also striking is no ALDs with connections to LLNL or UC.

It will be interesting to see the composition of the Board of Governors/Directors for Triad - it there is one. I really hope that there isn't a BOG like clone. Looking at both ORNL and PNNL, it appears that Battelle does not use a "corporate" Board model for oversight of lab leadership and management. Considerable costs - money and time - will be saved by Lab staff not having to prepare watered down "everything is fine - we're doing great" powerpoint presentations for BOG meetings.
Anonymous said…
Battelle has a large ORNL footprint on the team, and added tread with INL, PNNL and NBACC staff that are also Battelle. Score one each for Flour and Huntington Ingalls, as well as one pick up from SNL. Then throw in a handful of UC lifers that are hold overs from LANS uppermost leadership for the last five years and one TBD and there you have it.

Still hard to determine what A&M has to do with Triad, other than pulling out the share of annual fee?
Anonymous said…
Curious how the proposal was RFP compliant with a TBA in the key personnel, since contracts were to be included in that. Anyone want to venture that something smells very bad here??
Anonymous said…
Fitch is ex-LLNL and now Battelle.
Anonymous said…
Looks like a solid leadership team for a science lab. I feel a 100x more comfortable with this team than I did the original LANS leadership team back in 2006 which had way too many from the industrial partners and production sites.
Anonymous said…
I’m surprised that our resident LANL hater has not quipped that A&M is missing from the LANL leadership roles because LANL already has enough cowboys already.

On a more serious note, the ALD for simulation and computation is still awaiting announcement.
Anonymous said…
No Texas a&m involvement, for now, is perfectly ressonable if dedisions are based on merit and guided by the "best athlete" for the position model that Thom Mason articulated to us.
Anonymous said…
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Curious how the proposal was RFP compliant with a TBA in the key personnel, since contracts were to be included in that. Anyone want to venture that something smells very bad here??

July 18, 2018 at 3:07 PM

That does seem way out of bounds from the RFP.
Anonymous said…
I’m surprised that our resident LANL hater has not quipped that A&M is missing from the LANL leadership roles because LANL already has enough cowboys already.


It is not the cowboys from Texas I am worried about, it is the UC cowboys who no doubt made sure to marginalize Texas AM, because they think they are the best and brightest.

Popular posts from this blog

Plutonium Shots on NIF.

Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises to pursue such stupid ideas as doing Plutonium experiments on NIF. The stupidity arises from the fact that a huge population is placed at risk in the short and long term. Why do this kind of experiment in a heavily populated area? Only a moron would push that kind of imbecile area. Do it somewhere else in the god forsaken hills of Los Alamos. Why should the communities in the Bay Area be subjected to such increased risk just because the lab's NIF has failed twice and is trying the Hail Mary pass of doing an SNM experiment just to justify their existence? Those Laser EoS techniques and the people analyzing the raw data are all just BAD anyways. You know what comes next after they do the experiment. They'll figure out that they need larger samples. More risk for the local population. Stop this imbecilic pursuit. They wan...

Trump is to gut the labs.

The budget has a 20% decrease to DOE office of science, 20% cut to NIH. NASA also gets a cut. This will  have a huge negative effect on the lab. Crazy, juts crazy. He also wants to cut NEA and PBS, this may not seem like  a big deal but they get very little money and do great things.

Why Workplace Jargon Is A Big Problem

From the Huffington Post Why Workplace Jargon Is A Big Problem http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/04/25/work-words_n_5159868.html?utm_hp_ref=business&ir=Business When we replace a specific task with a vague expression, we grant the task more magnitude than it deserves. If we don't describe an activity plainly, it seems less like an easily achievable goal and more like a cloudy state of existence that fills unknowable amounts of time. A fog of fast and empty language has seeped into the workplace. I say it's time we air it out, making room for simple, concrete words, and, therefore, more deliberate actions. By striking the following 26 words from your speech, I think you'll find that you're not quite as overwhelmed as you thought you were. Count the number that LLNLs mangers use.  touch base circle back bandwidth - impactful - utilize - table the discussion deep dive - engagement - viral value-add - one-sheet deliverable - work product - incentivise - take it to the ...