BLOG purpose

This BLOG is for LLNL present and past employees, friends of LLNL and anyone impacted by the privatization of the Lab to express their opinions and expose the waste, wrongdoing and any kind of injustice against employees and taxpayers by LLNS/DOE/NNSA. The opinions stated are personal opinions. Therefore, The BLOG author may or may not agree with them before making the decision to post them. Comments not conforming to BLOG rules are deleted. Blog author serves as a moderator. For new topics or suggestions, email jlscoob5@gmail.com

Wednesday, February 22, 2012

Budget Forced Delay of Los Alamos Plutonium Lab

Anonymously contributed:

From Global Security Newswire
Feb. 21, 2012

Budget Forced Delay of Los Alamos Plutonium Lab: DOE Secretary

Spending restrictions forced the Obama administration to slash funding for a plutonium facility at the Los Alamos National Laboratory in New Mexico, Energy Secretary Steven Chu said on Thursday (see GSN, Feb. 14).

The Energy Department's semi-autonomous National Nuclear Security Administration plans a five-year delay in construction of the Chemistry and Metallurgy Research Replacement site, which would supplant a decades-old facility that provides analytical chemistry and other research services for production of plutonium nuclear-weapon cores at Los Alamos. The replacement plant is now estimated to cost up to $6 billion.

"Because of the budget constraints ... we have to look at all the other projects and we felt we could not simply start CMRR and the Uranium Processing Facility at Oak Ridge," the Albuquerque Journal quoted Chu as saying during a Senate committee hearing. "We felt there was more compelling reason to begin with that" UPF site at the Y-12 National Security Complex in Tennessee.

A senior NNSA official last week said the deterioration of an existing Y-12 facility for processing weapon-grade uranium demanded that the Uranium Processing Facility take precedence. The administration is seeking $340 million for the project in the budget year that begins on Oct. 1.

Some observers have said the budget decision spells the end for the Los Alamos plutonium facility. Chu, though, said his department intends to move ahead with design of the site to 90 percent.

"That's very prudent because for a number of reasons, before you start construction it is best to have most of it designed," he told the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee.

Committee Chairman Jeff Bingaman (D-N.M.) said Chu skirted his questions about the plutonium project but that he would continue to pursue the matter.

"The truth is we don't know at this point whether there is a case to be made that they are making a mistake here," the lawmaker said. "Clearly, the projected cost of this facility has grown enormously, and I'm sure that's one reason they've decided not to go forward with it as this point."

5 comments:

Anonymous said...

Does anyone believe that the CMRR project was delayed because it was just too large and expensive in a time of debt. It was much too large and expensive from it's inception. NNSA can continue it's mission with out it, what does that tell us? LANL's last effort to bilk the tax-payer out of Billions.

Anonymous said...

While the budgets of all the other NNSA labs seem to be doing well -- even drastically *expanding* by 30% next year at SNL ! -- the budget at LANL is being decimated. It's not just CMRR that's the problem.

LANS leadership of LANL has been an abysmal failure. Because of this, around 800 of the regular staff will now be chopped and suffer the economic hardships that will follow.


Heckavajob, Charlie McMillan!

You da' man, Brett Knapp!

Enjoy your annual 20% bonuses!

Anonymous said...

Not fair to single out Knapp. You heard McMilian say that the whole LISC was in this together.

Anonymous said...

Not fair to single out Knapp. You heard McMilian say that the whole LISC was in this together.

February 22, 2012 11:25 AM

Why not, Knapp has reprised and targeted me and others. You must not know Knapp, he's pr**ck in every sense of the word!

Anonymous said...

Not fair to single out Knapp. You heard McMilian say that the whole LISC was in this together.

February 22, 2012 11:25 AM

Fair? Don't even use the word fair and Knapp in the same sentence. I have not seen Knapp play fair or even fight fair. This is the type of guy Wild West that used to keep a derringer in his sleeve and a knife in his pocket to have the upper cheating hand in a fist or gunfight.

Blog Archive