BLOG purpose

This BLOG is for LLNL present and past employees, friends of LLNL and anyone impacted by the privatization of the Lab to express their opinions and expose the waste, wrongdoing and any kind of injustice against employees and taxpayers by LLNS/DOE/NNSA. The opinions stated are personal opinions. Therefore, The BLOG author may or may not agree with them before making the decision to post them. Comments not conforming to BLOG rules are deleted. Blog authors serve as moderators. For new topics or suggestions, email jlscoob5@gmail.com

Friday, February 10, 2012

real mission is to make the world safer

Director Parney Albright opened his first all-hands meeting of the year with the observation that 2012 is "going to be a very busy year, and the next couple years are going to be very important for our Lab and how we contribute to the nation."

He then presented his view of the Laboratory's mission, vision, values and priorities, noting the things he will focus on, as well as what he wants employees to focus on. (See the whole presentation).

"Our mission is pretty much straight out of the LLNS Prime Contract," Albright noted. "Or as George Shultz put it during his recent visit here this week, our 'real mission is to make the world safer.'

"We do this in a lot of different ways - our traditional focus on nuclear deterrence and our broadening efforts in national security. In fact, there's a lot of debate in Congress and elsewhere on how to move to a stable global environment."

Turning to his vision for the Lab, Albright said that he thinks "we're pretty much there - leading in delivering solutions for the nation's most challenging problems."

He stressed that one of the challenges with vision statements demonstrating or measuring success is achieving that vision. In describing the three elements of his vision, Albright repeatedly emphasized the imperative for excellence and the goal of being recognized as second to none.

"We're expensive, so we need to be worth the money," he explained. "When people have a hard problem, I want them to think that the first place to go is Livermore."

Albright also noted that a reputation for excellence is critical if LLNL is going to continue to be a top destination for the best scientists, engineers and other professionals. "People come here because they want to work with the very best - the best people, the best facilities, the best workplace environment."

Moving onto Lab values, he observed that these characteristics are not necessarily where we are today. Rather, they describe the values and the culture that we want to strive to create.

At the top of the Director's list is his strong belief that "We are one Lab." He emphasized that all employees should feel a sense of pride in all the accomplishments made at the Lab, regardless of what program they work in and regardless of the program making the accomplishments. "We have shared pride and shared responsibility. We need to think institutionally."

In discussing the next two values - operating solely in the national interest and focusing on sponsor needs - Albright cautioned against hubris. "We need to be careful not to think that because we're really smart, we know best. That's a slippery slope.

"We don't own a thing here," he added. "The U.S. government owns all of this and we need to take care of that responsibility."

With regard to the values describing workplace interactions, Albright was emphatic that striving for excellence, intense competition of ideas and rigorous critique must be "rank blind."

"No person, no matter how junior, should feel constrained from asking questions or offering suggestions or opinions," he said.

Turning to his priorities, Albright observed that while mission, vision and values are "hopefully timeless," this list "is what I want us to focus on over the next few years."

Not surprisingly, the top priority is to deliver on the W78 Life Extension Program and the National Ignition Campaign. "We must deliver on these important commitments."

Albright also emphasized his focus on improving business practices, giving as an example the existence of five different financial systems across the Lab. "There may have been good reasons for developing these different systems at one time or another, but it makes it hard to be cost efficient."

As part of his emphasis on creating a workplace that fosters excellence, he noted that the priority of ensuring cutting-edge science and technology capabilities means more than recruiting a top-notch workforce. "It also means facilities and equipment and infrastructure.

"We've ridden on the back of the Weapons Program, but we can't do that anymore. We need to find institutional ways to support these capabilities so we can stay at the cutting edge and in front of the power curve as new areas emerge."

Also on the list of priorities is expanding the Lab's contributions to the local and national economy through industry and university partnerships. "My vision is that, several years from now, we'll be in the midst of a vibrant innovation center, a technology hub with the Lab at its center.

To make this vision a reality, Albright noted that in addition to Sequoia, the world's fastest supercomputer, the Lab will soon be home to a powerful multi-petaflop unclassified machine at the Livermore Valley Open Campus (LVOC) to solve problems of economic importance to the country.

In addition, Albright announced that Buck Koonce has been appointed director of Economic Development, with responsibility for integrating the Laboratory's partnership activities with industry, academia, economic development and the Livermore Valley Open Campus.

Several other key management appointments were also announced, including Bruce Warner as acting principal associate director for Global Security, Wes Spain as acting director of the Office of Strategic Outcomes and Al Ramponi as the director's chief of staff. In addition, Kimberley Davis was introduced as the new manager of the Livermore Site Office.

Albright introduced the 10 recipients who have been recently selected as Laboratory Distinguished Members of the Technical Staff: Jim Candy, John Castor, Jim Hammer, Omar Hurricane, Neil Joeck, Nino Landen, Ken Moody, Bruce Remington, Dimitri Ryutov, and Tom Slezak. These individuals are recognized for their extraordinary scientific and technical contributions to the Laboratory and its missions as acknowledged by their professional peers and the larger community. [A feature article will appear in Newsline next week highlighting the recipients.]

Wrapping up his briefing, Parney noted that one focus area for the coming year is succession planning, both for management positions and for critical-skilled personnel

He announced that because of the Laboratory's outstanding performance last year, a 1.5-percent Strategic Performance Bonus will be distributed to eligible personnel this year; the one-time payment will be made some time in April. "We had a really good year last year. In fact, we had the highest performance score of all the NNSA labs."

(For more information on this program, see the Web.)

Albright also reported that NNSA has, for the second time, denied the Lab's request to begin employer contributions to the TCP1 defined benefit pension plan, based on the rationale that because the plan is currently funded at 104 percent of its obligations, contributions are not legally required. "We're not happy with this decision, and we're watching the situation very closely. If need be, we will elevate this issue to higher levels," Albright said.

Albright also mentioned that the Laboratory is celebrating its 60th anniversary this year. Various activities and events are being planned to commemorate the occasion, including a Family Open House.

In closing, Albright emphasized "we're all in this together. Let's work together as one Lab. Let's keep our communications strong and promote the sponsor relationships we need to really make a difference for the nation."

18 comments:

Anonymous said...

why in the world does the % of over-funding of tcp1 at LLNL go down every year while number of participants is fixed?

Anonymous said...

The bond rate. Pension liabilities are tied to the AA corporate bond yield by law (Assets are tied to market performance). The Fed has been doing everything in its power to drive down interest rates, which then by law drives the present value calculation of the long term liabilities.

Anonymous said...

Thank you!

Anonymous said...

Also, present worth of future liabilities are going up quickly these days because so many folks are in the 50-60 demographic where the 'age factor' increases.

Anonymous said...

The Fed has been doing everything in its power to drive down interest rates, which then by law drives the present value calculation of the long term liabilities.

February 10, 2012 4:30 PM

BS. Interest rates have been essentially zero for several years. The Fed is out of bullets.

Anonymous said...

The other disparity I see is how in the world is he LANS pension "tanked", that is, so much in the red? Can someone answer this? DOE/NNS sure did Anastasio the quick "go-ahead" to start taxing LANL TCP-1 employees. I'm also currently contributing 8% of my salary to this. On top of a zero raise for many of us at LANS, things are really "screwed up". And just wait until Monday when the President's Budget gives CMMR the big ZERO! RIFs will be reqired. Things are looking up at LANS!

Anonymous said...

Not surprisingly, the top priority is to deliver on the W78 Life Extension Program and the National Ignition Campaign. "We must deliver on these important commitments." Albright

Ah yes, the W78. Another LANS debacle. Knapp gave this weapon system to LLNS to save his "home Lab". The disgrace of this decision is that while LLNS has no capability or knowledge of this system, neither did LANS, Knapp exterminated all his Senior Weapon Engineers. What a joke!

Anonymous said...

Great leadership at LANS. They see CMMR running off a cliff and also decide to give LLNS the W78. Duh! Otta boy McMillan, great vision and leadership.

Anonymous said...

W78 lep

Desperate to give LLNL any weapon project, whether needed or not, to provide some relevance of LLNL to the stockpile.

Does LLNL actually have enough people, or the right people, to meet the needs of a project like this? When did LLNL last actually do something with a weapon?

NIF

Do we actually need multiple shifts running at NIF? Talk about pouring money down the drain!

Anonymous said...

Sounds like Parney has some ideas for the future beyond mere survival.
Also telling that he was not compelled to spin the story again of how he was the only person that could do the job. Comeon, Charlie, folks are just plain tired of hearing that the job description was written for you because you were the ONLY one that could do it. It just does not ring true.

Anonymous said...

Regarding the fed driving down interest rates for years, yes it has been going down for about 3 years, and every point it goes down adds millions to the liability. Right now the AA Bond yield rate is around 4 1/2 percent, and has been at this (lowest) point for a while. Hence, LLNL has been requesting now for 2 years restarting employer and employee contributions. Not BS---just facts.

Anonymous said...

Thanks Scooby for the quite complete report from the all hands. There are a lot of positive things said there, including recognition of the waste of multiple directorates duplicating things and battling each other, and the need to make LLNL attractive to young scientists in part by finally being able to use current technology as we do our jobs. Now the question is how much progress is possible in a system that has a huge amount of inertia and a horrible bureaucratic overseer in DOE/NNSA?

Anonymous said...

I know enough about the W78 to say that Livermore is in for some real surprises with this weapon system. There was little documented on the "complexities" of this weapon system. Also, the knowledge and wisdom to refurbish this weapon system has been lost or tossed. Good luck Livermore, you'll need it!

Anonymous said...

For those of us who are retired, but in TCP-1 what were the figures that Parney presented?

Also, did he mention where we can get a copy of the actuarial calculations so we can check them?

Anonymous said...

He stated that tcp1 was 104% funded

Anonymous said...

How much did that change from last year?

Where is the actuary's report available?

Anonymous said...

How much did that change from last year?

Where is the actuary's report available?

February 13, 2012 12:23 PM

Why do you want someone else to do your research for you? Surely if you are competent to "analyze" the report you are competent to find it. If necessary, educate yourself on how to submit a FOIA request. Stop being so lazy.

Anonymous said...

"Why do you want someone else to do your research for you? Surely if you are competent to "analyze" the report you are competent to find it. If necessary, educate yourself on how to submit a FOIA request. Stop being so lazy..."

Jeesh. On your period? Asked is someone already has walked this path.

Blog Archive