Contributor said: this is so funny:
http://nuclear-news.net/2013/01/18/1000-000-curies-of-radiation-released-from-the-lawrence-livermore-since-it-began/
Blog purpose
This BLOG is for LLNL present and past employees, friends of LLNL and anyone impacted by the privatization of the Lab to express their opinions and expose the waste, wrongdoing and any kind of injustice against employees and taxpayers by LLNS/DOE/NNSA.
The opinions stated are personal opinions. Therefore,
The BLOG author may or may not agree with them before making the decision to post them.
Comments not conforming to BLOG rules are deleted.
Blog author serves as a moderator.
For new topics or suggestions, email jlscoob5@gmail.com
Blog rules
- Stay on topic.
- No profanity, threatening language, pornography.
- NO NAME CALLING.
- No political debate.
- Posts and comments are posted several times a day.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Posts you viewed tbe most last 30 days
-
LGBT intolerance problem at Sandia? I was just checking glassdoor.com and noticed several comments suggesting intolerance to LGBT at Sandia...
-
So did you SSVSP and why? Give details.
-
“Raise a concern, get blackballed then lose your job and benefits…” “…instead of raising your concerns just leverage on your skills and go t...
30 comments:
Ha, Ha, Ha. A million curies. That explains all of the deformed children in Livermore. Oh, wait, there aren't any.
I knew there was a reason for the improvement in the quality of Livermore Valley wines over the years.
The merlots and chardonnays seem to benefit the most from prolonged imaginary radiation exposure.
And the improvement in the quality of the downtown area, both arts and restaurants, also seem to benefit from the Russian observed phenomena.
And, the metastasizing of bicycle trails under prolonged exposure, does seem to have a surprizing palliative effect.
And, the disposition and beauty of female employees at LLNL has remained constant or even increased over the decades, raising the question, do human females thrive in an intense imaginary radiation flux?
Don't ya just love Russian nationalists, just isolated and orthodox enough to be serious and self-satirizing at the same time. Like a younger, prettier Bill Maher.
You actually give this person credibility?
The uncommon vision of atheists.
Methode Curie.
So that's what they mean by "It's the water."
Methode Curie.
January 25, 2013 at 2:44 PM
More like Methadone Curie.
" Anonymous Anonymous said...
The uncommon vision of atheists.
January 25, 2013 at 2:43 PM"
Atheists built the bomb. You would not have a job without atheists.
Atheists built the bomb. You would not have a job without atheists.
January 27, 2013 at 8:30 AM
What an arrogantly ignorant statement. I'm sure it makes you feel better to believe it, but I'll bet the hypocrisy of you belittling Christians and Jews for their beliefs that make them feel better escapes you. Read some history of the Manhattan Project and its workers.
What an arrogantly ignorant statement. I'm sure it makes you feel better to believe it, but I'll bet the hypocrisy of you belittling Christians and Jews for their beliefs that make them feel better escapes you. Read some history of the Manhattan Project and its workers.
January 27, 2013 at 10:26 AM
Well it sure looks like atheists where rather important for building the bomb.
These are just a list from the celebrity
http://www.celebatheists.com/
but there are many more
Manhattan project
J. Robert Oppenheimer
Edward Teller
Hans Bethe
Niels Bohr
James Chadwick
Paul Dirac
Enrico Fermi
Richard Feynman
Victor Frederick Weisskopf
James Franck
Isidor Isaac Rabi
John von Neumann
Stanislaw Ulam
Leó Szilárd
Joseph Rotblat
Gordon Gould
Harold C. Urey
Mark Oliphant
Samuel Isaac Weissman
Frederick Reines
Others relevant to the Manhattan project but working directly
Albert Einstein
Eugene Wigner
Max Born
Subrahmanyan Chandrasekhar
George Gamow
Marshall Rosenbluth
Some other stats
The National Academy of Science charted belief in God as low as 5.5 percent among biologists and 7.5 percent among physicist and astronomers in a 1998 study.
. http://www.stephenjaygould.org/ctrl/news…
A few fun ones
Thomas Edison
Bill Gates
Warren Buffet
Steve Wozniak,
Steve Jobs
Mark Zuckerberg
Richard Branson
Ted Turner
Woody Allen,
Alan Turing,
Ridley Scott
Natalie Portman
Douglas Adams
Benjamin Franklin
Sir Edmund Hillary
Pat Tillman
Angelina Jolie
Brad Pitt
Lance Armstrong (oops)
Ayn Rand (Does not count since she though she was God)
Totally bogus information from a totally bogus web site. If it's on the web, it must be true, right? Did you personally ask those people whether they believed in God? I see that you still haven't actually read any history.
"Totally bogus information from a totally bogus web site. If it's on the web, it must be true, right? Did you personally ask those people whether they believed in God? I see that you still haven't actually read any history.
January 27, 2013 at 10:07 PM"
I think it is you who needs to read history.
Who gives a rat's ass?
Signed,
God
Who gives a rat's ass?
Signed,
God
January 28, 2013 at 5:41 PM
OK, God, I guess the people who worship you as omniscient are just fools. Back to sleep, now.
When you understand why you dismiss all the other possible gods, you will understand why I dismiss yours.
Stephen Roberts
"I see that you still haven't actually read any history.
January 27, 2013 at 10:07 PM"
Read up on the history of the Manhattan project. Yup they where almost all atheists. Dog On!
I chewed on Dawkins a week ago and will munch on Hitchens this weekend. Boy was he surprised.
Both were better than Schopenhauer, who I remember as dry and bitter bones. Not juicy at all like the wonderful Medici popes.
Screwtape
When you understand why you dismiss all the other possible gods, you will understand why I dismiss yours.
Stephen Roberts
And you, Mr. Roberts will better understand your mistake shortly. It's not your intellect, but your lack of humanity that will damn you.
he National Academy of Science charted belief in God as low as 5.5 percent among biologists and 7.5 percent among physicist and astronomers in a 1998 study...
until they get old...must hedge our bets. Few atheists near death.
"And you, Mr. Roberts will better understand your mistake shortly. It's not your intellect, but your lack of humanity that will damn you.
January 28, 2013 at 11:05 PM"
And it is humane to conclude that you got lucky in your choice of god and every other religion got it wrong.
“We are all atheists about most of the gods that humanity has ever believed in. Some of us just go one god further.”
― Richard Dawkins, The God Delusion
“We are all atheists about most of the gods that humanity has ever believed in. Some of us just go one god further.”
― Richard Dawkins, The God Delusion
January 29, 2013 at 7:01 PM
A complete distortion of the history of religion (and even the definition of religion and of "god") among the human race. But a great sound bite.
"A little learning is a dangerous thing" - Alexander Pope.
So you people think every is just fine its not I played in a field not a little over a mile from llnl on mcgraw road when I was a kid with the sounds of warning sirens screeming from the llnl my well water was contamanated all most ever body in my family has cancwr. And I do as well and that's just the begining forty years after the start get a clue think befor you drink
contamanation is not the answer for cancer
contamanation is not the answer for cancer
January 31, 2013 at 10:29 AM
Agreed. In addition to the contamination issue there must be some genetic predisposition at work, and also one wonders why, if the wells were contaminated, that you continued to drink from them? Forty years ago was the early 70's and many rules were already in effect (the Clean Water Act amendments of 1972, although it was new at the time) for drinking water. If you haven't sought Federal advice and aid, you should. The question of LLNL responsibility in your case should be easily answered.
" contamanation is not the answer for cancer
January 31, 2013 at 10:29 AM
Agreed. In addition to the contamination issue there must be some genetic predisposition at work, and also one wonders why, if the wells were contaminated, that you continued to drink from them? Forty years ago was the early 70's and many rules were already in effect (the Clean Water Act amendments of 1972, although it was new at the time) for drinking water. If you haven't sought Federal advice and aid, you should. The question of LLNL responsibility in your case should be easily answered.
January 31, 2013 at 7:27 PM"
You heartless atheist, did it ever occur to you that maybe they did not know that the water was contaminated? Did it ever occur to you that this person has already sought out Federal service?
Did it ever occur to you that this person has already sought out Federal service?
February 1, 2013 at 6:40 AM
Did you ever read the actual post? "If you haven't sought Federal advice and aid, you should." Sheesh.
I would love to but its hard to talk when no body will listen I personally talked to marylee kelly who runs tri-valley cares which oversees the clean-up of Llnl she told me she knew of the dwellings and of my family who resided in them but she wrote me off.i even contacted erin brokovich she told me she couldn't help everybody.i have been asking for help for years but you mention llnl and they tuck their tails. i appreciate any advice you give me its not ignored. as far as drinking the water we were never told we were just pushed off the land.
Tell that to the ghost of Edward teller
Tell that to the ghost of Edward teller
Post a Comment