This BLOG is for LLNL present and past employees, friends of LLNL and anyone impacted by the privatization of the Lab to express their opinions and expose the waste, wrongdoing and any kind of injustice against employees and taxpayers by LLNS/DOE/NNSA.
The opinions stated are personal opinions. Therefore,
The BLOG author may or may not agree with them before making the decision to post them.
Comments not conforming to BLOG rules are deleted.
Blog author serves as a moderator.
For new topics or suggestions, email jlscoob5@gmail.com
Blog rules
Stay on topic.
No profanity, threatening language, pornography.
NO NAME CALLING.
No political debate.
Posts and comments are posted several times a day.
Thursday, February 28, 2013
Bad News Letter on Friday?
Bad News Letter on Friday? I have been hearing that NNSA is about to issue the labs and plants official letters to start initiating furloughs and layoffs!!
Anyone else hear or seen this yet?
3 comments:
Anonymous
said...
But, but, but, but.... Charlie McMillan just issued a memo saying no furloughs or layoffs were planned at LANL.
There will be no announcements of lab layoffs.... until right before the layoffs begin.
March 7, 2013 at 7:50 AM
Only if the lawyers can claim the WARN Act doesn't apply. One big loophole is that the Act does not apply if fewer than 500 employees are laid off and that number is less than 1/3 of the total workforce at a site. This exists because the Act was intended to apply only to "plant closings and mass layoffs."
3 comments:
But, but, but, but.... Charlie McMillan just issued a memo saying no furloughs or layoffs were planned at LANL.
There will be no announcements of lab layoffs.... until right before the layoffs begin.
Be very careful putting a sense of job security into the words coming from the NNSA labs' management.
There will be no announcements of lab layoffs.... until right before the layoffs begin.
March 7, 2013 at 7:50 AM
Only if the lawyers can claim the WARN Act doesn't apply. One big loophole is that the Act does not apply if fewer than 500 employees are laid off and that number is less than 1/3 of the total workforce at a site. This exists because the Act was intended to apply only to "plant closings and mass layoffs."
Post a Comment