DOE having trouble finding copies of letters to Chu on Y-12 security investigation.
NNSA makes top banner post on POGO again.
'In
November 2012, the Project On Government Oversight learned that former
Department of Energy (DOE) Secretary Steven Chu asked three former
senior government officials to review physical security at all U.S.
nuclear weapons facilities and individually write a letter with their
findings and recommendations for security improvements.
After
learning of this latest security commission, POGO filed a Freedom of
Information Act (FOIA) request to obtain the letters filled with
security recommendations from these experts.
POGO requested:
"All
reports, letters, or other correspondence between former Nuclear
Regulatory Commission Chairman Richard Meserve, retired Air Force Maj.
Gen. Donald Alston, and retired Lockheed martin CEO Norm Augustine to or
from Secretary Chu from January 2011 to the present. Specifically,
anything related to the break-in at the Y12 facility and DOE’s model for
protecting nuclear materials across the weapons complex."
On
January 18, a DOE response informed POGO that the request was assigned
to the Office of the Executive Secretariat who searched the Electronic
Document Online Correspondence and Concurrence System, which tracks all
formal correspondence. This search did not yield any results, but the
Executive Secretariat would continue to look for any documents.
Just
seven days later, POGO heard from the DOE again: “A search of Secretary
Chu’s emails was conducted, for communications with the individuals
referenced in your request. That search produced no responsive
documents.”
Although POGO was able to obtain the letters through
other avenues, it is rather remarkable that such a thorough search of
Secretary Chu’s correspondence did not result in a single mention of
this security commission or the reports that had been sent to him on
December 6, 2012.
As these letters so clearly highlight, we are
at a tipping point. Major changes must be made to the way the DOE and
the NNSA approach physical security of our nuclear weapons, as
demonstrated by the recent security failure at the Y-12 complex that
allowed three protestors within feet of 300-400 metric tons of highly
enriched uranium. It is POGO’s hope that the information in these
letters will ensure immediate steps are taken to improve the security of
the nuclear weapons complex.'
Blog purpose
This BLOG is for LLNL present and past employees, friends of LLNL and anyone impacted by the privatization of the Lab to express their opinions and expose the waste, wrongdoing and any kind of injustice against employees and taxpayers by LLNS/DOE/NNSA.
The opinions stated are personal opinions. Therefore,
The BLOG author may or may not agree with them before making the decision to post them.
Comments not conforming to BLOG rules are deleted.
Blog author serves as a moderator.
For new topics or suggestions, email jlscoob5@gmail.com
Blog rules
- Stay on topic.
- No profanity, threatening language, pornography.
- NO NAME CALLING.
- No political debate.
- Posts and comments are posted several times a day.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Posts you viewed tbe most last 30 days
-
So what do the NNSA labs do under the the 2nd Trump administration ? What are the odds we will have a test?
-
Do you remember how hard it was to get a Q clearance? You needed a good reputation, good credit and you couldn't lie about anything. We...
-
The end of LANL and LLNL? "After host Maria Bartiromo questioned whether the two plan to “close down entire agencies,” Ramaswamy said...
5 comments:
Anonymous said...
As these letters so clearly highlight, we are at a tipping point.
February 10, 2013 at 1:37 PM
Right. Yawn. Yeah, "tipping point." The usual 20% or did I miss something? ANyone who thinks things are going to change significantly in the next 4 years is dreaming.
Norm Augustine, retired Lockheed martin CEO in his letter to Sec. Chu concludes that the best and most secure option for addressing the standardization and contractor issues is federalization of the guard force. Augustine states that federalization is “somewhat contrary to his confessed personal prejudices but that he believes it could fix many of the serious problems in the current system.
However, Augustine notes that if federalization of the guard force for any reason is not practicable to implement, the model used at PX & recently introduced at Y-12 should be workable. Having observed the “dumbing-down” of job qualifications for technical/analytical slots at PX & observing Fed/M&O security mgr.s changing performance test results from negative to positive makes me think Augustine might not be getting the full story about the PX model. As for federalization of the guard force – it needs more thought, imo.
He wiped his ass with them.
Best use of public input.
Imo, it doesn’t speak well of America & it’s workforce when it’s considered better to Federalize a workforce than use the the Free Enterprise System as the only real means to prevent a strike/work stoppage at critical CAT-1 facilities.
February 15, 2013 at 2:42 AM:
Just curious: why did you capitalize "free enterprise system"? It is not a title or a company or institutional name.
Post a Comment