BLOG purpose

This BLOG is for LLNL present and past employees, friends of LLNL and anyone impacted by the privatization of the Lab to express their opinions and expose the waste, wrongdoing and any kind of injustice against employees and taxpayers by LLNS/DOE/NNSA. The opinions stated are personal opinions. Therefore, The BLOG author may or may not agree with them before making the decision to post them. Comments not conforming to BLOG rules are deleted. Blog author serves as a moderator. For new topics or suggestions, email jlscoob5@gmail.com

Tuesday, September 16, 2014

Sexual harassment lawsuit against LANL

New Mexico newspapers ran a recent story about settlement of sexual harassment lawsuit against LANL. Another example of your tax dollars hard at work, or something like that.

10 comments:

Anonymous said...

Notice how the lowly peons are all required to take the sexual harassment training but it is always the upper management that is caught at the predatory sexual harassment game?

Anonymous said...

,,, the "bombshell" paragraph in that article:

"That message (Doyle's) conflicted with the laboratory’s principal work developing nuclear weapons, but the laboratory’s security experts cleared it for publication. Then, after hearing complaints from a Republican staff member of the House Armed Services Committee, more senior laboratory officials opted to classify the article retroactively, dock Doyle’s pay, and cancel his clearances." (News Article)


So they appear to have retroactively decided something was classified and then punished Doyle for something lab security people had previously OK'd for him to publish? He followed the security policy rules and then got clobbered for it?

Amazing! What type of low-life scum do these things at the NNSA labs and why are they allowed to keep THEIR clearances? This story stinks to high heaven! Has the corruption and rot at the top of the NNSA management chain become this evil?


Anonymous said...

Notice how the lowly peons are all required to take the sexual harassment training but it is always the upper management that is caught at the predatory sexual harassment game?

September 16, 2014 at 7:55 PM

Those are the ones who need to know how to recognize it so they can report it. Most victims are lacking education and awareness about the problem and how to deal with it. The management types who perpetrate it won't benefit from training.

Anonymous said...

Most likely there's more to the story. The misdeed is too simply stated.

Anonymous said...

Most likely there's more to the story. The misdeed is too simply stated.


Why does there need to be more to the story? If a woman feels she has been sexually harassed, then she has been. This is minute one of the sex harass training.

Maybe men and women don't deserve to or can handle working together. There should be a Men's LANL and a Women's LANL on separate Mesas.

Anonymous said...

If a woman feels she has been sexually harassed, then she has been. This is minute one of the sex harass training.

September 23, 2014 at 1:49 PM

Sorry, no. A "victim" does not decide whether a crime has been committed. Governments hire professionals to do that. The most a "victim" can do is CLAIM is that she was harassed. That's criminology 101.

BTW, why did you capitalize "mesas"? The tendency to capitalize words inappropriately is a strong indication of lack of education.

Anonymous said...

... or just delusional excitement.

Anonymous said...

Sorry, no. A "victim" does not decide whether a crime has been committed. Governments hire professionals to do that. The most a "victim" can do is CLAIM is that she was harassed. That's criminology 101.

Sorry Perry Mason. In sex harass training at LLNL, it's the victim that decides the crime. Go to training. There was a lively discussion when I took the training.

We must first understand that women must be especially protected from unwanted sounds.

BUT IN THE END, THE SEPARATE MESA IDEA MAKES SENSE.

Anonymous said...

This is not the tarts first sexual harassment rodeo. She has filed other suits against other entities and has failed. The civil suit got dropped because of the overwhelming evidence that supported her being a tease in anticipation of a promotion. Reams and reams of emails, pictures and witnesses. Had LANS gone through the whole trial, they would have won, but at a far greater cost than the $100k the victims are bragging about getting and the slimy lawyers charge. The new LANS retirement option...integrety comes pretty cheap to the Gormans

Anonymous said...

Oh DS, you are so wrong on every single "fact" you started above. You are pathetic. If you have something to say, gimme a call if you have the guts.

Blog Archive