Speaking of LANL directors having gone downhill, Sandia's went downhill in a big way with the new director Jill Hruby. They covered up the fact that she doesn't even have a PhD by using her gender and shoving that in everybody's face. If you said you thought she is a bozo unfit to run a Natl lab, they'll just call you a sexist.
I had to GTFO after her appointment, having realized the UNM and non-PhD crowd had completely taken over the place finally.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Posts you viewed tbe most last 30 days
-
LGBT intolerance problem at Sandia? I was just checking glassdoor.com and noticed several comments suggesting intolerance to LGBT at Sandia...
-
So did you SSVSP and why? Give details.
-
“Raise a concern, get blackballed then lose your job and benefits…” “…instead of raising your concerns just leverage on your skills and go t...
30 comments:
By any chance are you a mediocre Ph.d that failed to live up to expectations?
Sexist.
Right. Anyone who complains about a woman's lack of qualifications, no matter how meager they are, is automatically a "sexist." Brainless liberal much?
Even if she violated her management agreement (aka contract) and gained 50 lbs ! LOL
Right. Anyone who complains about a woman's lack of qualifications, no matter how meager they are, is automatically a "sexist." Brainless liberal much?
What is her lack of qualification?
What is her lack of qualification?
September 30, 2016 at 10:52 PM
Maybe nothing, but just questioning it shouldn't get you labeled a "sexist."
Maybe nothing, but just questioning it shouldn't get you labeled a "sexist."
October 1, 2016 at 3:00 PM
I never said you where sexist, I just said that you are a failed Phd. Care to reply?
I never said you where sexist, I just said that you are a failed Phd. Care to reply?
October 1, 2016 at 6:45 PM
September 30, 2016 at 5:48 PM did. To your nonsensical comment? No.
I never said you where sexist, I just said that you are a failed Phd. Care to reply?
October 1, 2016 at 6:45 PM
September 30, 2016 at 5:48 PM did. To your nonsensical comment? No.
October 2, 2016 at 10:28 AM
So you don't have a Ph.d Than why are you on Hruby's case if she does not have a Ph.d?
Degrees are over rated and if you had ever spent much time with Hruby you would know that she is not a typical master's.
So you don't have a Ph.d Than why are you on Hruby's case if she does not have a Ph.d?
October 2, 2016 at 1:41 PM
Actually I do have a Ph.D. (not a Ph.d). I just thought your annoying and repetitive posts were getting a little tired (at least I was tired of them).
Actually I do have a Ph.D. (not a Ph.d). I just thought your annoying and repetitive posts were getting a little tired (at least I was tired of them).
October 2, 2016 at 7:26 PM
I just thought your annoying and repetitive posts about Hruby not having a PhD were getting a little tired.
October 2, 2016 at 7:26 PM here. October 2, 2016 at 11:12 PM doesn't know who he is responding to. I am the one who complained about someone questioning her qualifications being called a "sexist." I said nothing about whether she has a Ph.D.. Nor do I care.
But apparently October 2, 2016 at 11:12 PM only cares about getting his repetitive blather into another post.
Degrees are over rated and if you had ever spent much time with Hruby you would know that she is not a typical master's.
October 2, 2016 at 4:23 PM
You are right, she is not typical. She is below average in technical knowledge and way below average in management skills.
. I am the one who complained about someone questioning her qualifications being called a "sexist." I said nothing about whether she has a Ph.D.. Nor do I care.
So you are saying that your are sexist? I guess you don't care either way. Wow, just wow.
Wow, just wow.
October 3, 2016 at 6:28 PM
Yeah, whatever. Idiot. I said I don't care whether or not she has a PhD. I also don't much care about the entire subject of Sandia. I just care about the politically correct garbage of calling someone who questions the professional qualifications of a female, for whatever position, being labeled a "sexist." Get it now, jerk?
Politically correct garbage? Who are you to decide what is or is not politically correct garbage? Is it politically correct garbage to call someone a jerk just because they disagrees with you? If not than we can assume that you are a jerk but you are cool with it, yep I think it get it now.
You don't have to be a jerk to disagree with me. But you chose to be one.
You don't have to be a jerk to disagree with me. But you chose to be one.
October 4, 2016 at 9:38 AM
No, you chose to define who is a jerk which appears to be anyone who just happens to disagree with you. This is a rather narrow definition and says alot more about you than it does about anyone who happens to disagree with you. I for one happen to disagree with your worldview that anyone who disagrees with you is a jerk. In fact anyone with your world view is probably a better definition of jerk than your narrow minded definition. What an empty joyless life you must live.
I for one happen to disagree with your worldview that anyone who disagrees with you is a jerk.
October 4, 2016 at 5:56 PM
People who respond to posts they haven't actually read or understood can reasonably be referred to as "jerks." As I said "you don't have to be a jerk to disagree with me." So you see I actually don't have the "worldview" you ascribe to me. In fact, I have always considered people who say they have a "worldview" to be pompous jerks.
In fact, I have always considered people who say they have a "worldview" to be pompous jerks.
October 5, 2016 at 10:18 AM
The lack of self-awareness is just astounding,really...,really astounding.
One's "self awareness" is usually seem by others as "self absorption." Just saying.
One's "self awareness" is usually seem by others as "self absorption." Just saying.
October 5, 2016 at 7:22 PM
Denial is not just a river in Egypt.
Mic drop....
Huh? Was that a comment for the posters here in general or just to make you feel better about yourself?
Huh? Was that a comment for the posters here in general or just to make you feel better about yourself?
October 5, 2016 at 9:40 PM
Sorry 9.40 PM but as they say, you justa gots pwnd BiG TiMNe and for the whole world to watch. Dam...I mean damm that was brutal!
WN (verb)
1. An act of dominating an opponent.
The term implies domination or humiliation of a rival,
Pronunciations
Because pwn is primarily used in written form, it has no single generally accepted pronunciation: renditions include /ˈoʊn/ OHN, /ˈpwoʊn/ PWOHN, /ˈpoʊn/ POHN, /pəʔˈoʊn/ pə'-OHN, /ˈpɔːn/ PAWN, /piːˈoʊn/ pee-OHN, and /ˈpwiːn/ PWEEN. Originally, pwn and its variants were pronounced /ˈoʊn/ in the same way as the verb own, the tail of the p being "silent". A notable usage of this pronunciation can be seen in the Internet distributed series Pure Pwnage (pronounced "pure ownage" /ˈpjʊər ˈoʊnᵻdʒ/).[7] [8][9]
Asshole.
October 11, 2016 at 8:39 PM
That is a very well thought out and insightful response that conveys perfectly your rock solid position and reflects on you reasoning and arguing skills.
It wasn't intended to do any of those things, but thanks anyway.
Oh look! Grown adults who worked at the same job 40 hours a week for 30 years are complaining about how the modern work economy fails to cater to them.
Grow up.
Huh? Self-analysis? Your comment bears no relevance to this thread. But that probably doesn't matter to you at all.
Post a Comment