Dismissed LLNS employee says DOE OHA Whistleblower process was
a "go-through-the-motions" process that coddled LLNS
https://lajicarita.wordpress.com/2018/06/07/update-on-anthony-riveras-whistleblower-case-against-lawrence-livermore-lab/
Blog purpose
This BLOG is for LLNL present and past employees, friends of LLNL and anyone impacted by the privatization of the Lab to express their opinions and expose the waste, wrongdoing and any kind of injustice against employees and taxpayers by LLNS/DOE/NNSA.
The opinions stated are personal opinions. Therefore,
The BLOG author may or may not agree with them before making the decision to post them.
Comments not conforming to BLOG rules are deleted.
Blog author serves as a moderator.
For new topics or suggestions, email jlscoob5@gmail.com
Blog rules
- Stay on topic.
- No profanity, threatening language, pornography.
- NO NAME CALLING.
- No political debate.
- Posts and comments are posted several times a day.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Posts you viewed tbe most last 30 days
-
Good article in Nature News on progress on Z with a mention of NIF's problems http://www.nature.com/news/triple-threat-method-sparks-h...
-
Actual post from Dec. 15 from one of the streams. This is a real topic. As far as promoting women and minorities even if their qualification...
-
" ...If there were damning factual evidence of anything untoward, it would obviously have been brought forward with great fanfare......
1 comment:
Anytime a contractor employee formally alleges contractor misconduct that could impact an award fee or legal fee reimbursement, DOE Department Counsel will be involved deluxe. The DOE OHA is too entwined with Department Counsel to objectively and impartially determine acts of contractor misconduct. Unless Secretary Perry (departing from the OHA/Department Counsel) makes a "final agency decision" in his favor, Mr. Rivera will likely end up taking DOE to court, where DOE isn't producing, editing, and determining the outcome of the case.
Post a Comment