Skip to main content

NNSA under Biden

 Incoming S-1 Granholm and Pres Biden seem to want DOE to focus on energy and climate science as opposed to nuclear weapons. It will be interesting during upcoming Senate confirmation hearings to get her position on the idea of moving NNSA to DOD.


A possible proposal I recently heard was to keep any NNSA site/activity that is 75% or more dedicated to weapons work within NNSA and then move the whole thing to DOD. That would mean Y-12, Pantex, Nevada Site, KCP, SRS, Naval Nuclear, and LANL pit production facilities go to DOD with NNSA... while LANL, LLNL and SNL stay with DOE in a reconstituted Office of Defense Program.

Clearly this would take Congressional actions to amend and revise the law that created the NNSA, but if any administration is going to try, this would be the one.

Comments

Anonymous said…
"A possible proposal I recently heard was to keep any NNSA site/activity that is 75% or more dedicated to weapons work within NNSA and then move the whole thing to DOD. That would mean Y-12, Pantex, Nevada Site, KCP, SRS, Naval Nuclear, and LANL pit production facilities go to DOD with NNSA... while LANL, LLNL and SNL stay with DOE in a reconstituted Office of Defense Program."

That kind of makes sense to me. I always though that pit production at LANL should be its own entity. Why not just have two facilities that are next to each other but with different governance.
Anonymous said…
Granholm's hearing is scheduled for Wednesday, January 27, 2021, at 9:30 a.m. EST.

They usually post the written advance copy of a nominee's opening speech on the committee's website. This could give a hint as to her knowledge of NNSA within DOE and interest in it.

Also there will be a link on the committee's website to the hearing coverage via webcast.

https://www.energy.senate.gov/hearings/2021/1/hearing-to-consider-nomination-of-the-honorable
Anonymous said…
Study some post-WWII history and the arguments for keeping nuclear weapon research and development in civilian control. There is a reason. Chesterton's Fence.
Anonymous said…
1/22/2021 5:36 PM

A civilian lead NNSA in DOD that's focused on nuclear weapon production and testing and reporting to the civilian Secretary of Defense, would still be under civilian control.

A civilian Undersecretary of Defense Programs in the DOE overseeing the nuclear weapons research and development at LANL, LLNL, and SNL, and reporting to the civilian Secretary of Energy, would be under civilian control.

This all said, I don't see any change to NNSA happening under this administration or any future one, as Congress has no interest in reorganizing the nuclear weapons complex again.

Also I suspect that Secretary Granholm's interest in NNSA business/operations, similar to S-1 Perry, will be zero to none. Signing the annual stockpile certification letter to the President will most likely be the extent of her involvement in US nuclear weapons. Whoever gets picked to be the new NNSA Administrator will probably have the most autonomy of any NA-1 in history.
Anonymous said…
1/23/2021 8:44 AM

I hope you are correct, but remembering Granholm years ago on Sunday talk shows when she was trying to make herself a pundit (and failing), she just isn't very bright.

Popular posts from this blog

Plutonium Shots on NIF.

Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises to pursue such stupid ideas as doing Plutonium experiments on NIF. The stupidity arises from the fact that a huge population is placed at risk in the short and long term. Why do this kind of experiment in a heavily populated area? Only a moron would push that kind of imbecile area. Do it somewhere else in the god forsaken hills of Los Alamos. Why should the communities in the Bay Area be subjected to such increased risk just because the lab's NIF has failed twice and is trying the Hail Mary pass of doing an SNM experiment just to justify their existence? Those Laser EoS techniques and the people analyzing the raw data are all just BAD anyways. You know what comes next after they do the experiment. They'll figure out that they need larger samples. More risk for the local population. Stop this imbecilic pursuit. They wan...

Trump is to gut the labs.

The budget has a 20% decrease to DOE office of science, 20% cut to NIH. NASA also gets a cut. This will  have a huge negative effect on the lab. Crazy, juts crazy. He also wants to cut NEA and PBS, this may not seem like  a big deal but they get very little money and do great things.

LLNL un-diversity

Actual post from Dec. 15 from one of the streams. This is a real topic. As far as promoting women and minorities even if their qualifications are not as good as the white male scientists, I am all for it. We need diversity at the lab and if that is what it takes, so be it.  Quit your whining. Look around the lab, what do you see? White male geezers. How many African Americans do you see at the lab? Virtually none. LLNL is one of the MOST undiverse places you will see. Face it folks, LLNL is an institution of white male privilege and they don't want to give up their privileged positions. California, a state of majority Hispanics has the "crown jewel" LLNL nestled in the middle of it with very FEW Hispanics at all!