BLOG purpose

This BLOG is for LLNL present and past employees, friends of LLNL and anyone impacted by the privatization of the Lab to express their opinions and expose the waste, wrongdoing and any kind of injustice against employees and taxpayers by LLNS/DOE/NNSA. The opinions stated are personal opinions. Therefore, The BLOG author may or may not agree with them before making the decision to post them. Comments not conforming to BLOG rules are deleted. Blog author serves as a moderator. For new topics or suggestions, email


  • Stay on topic.
  • No foul, vulgar, or inflammatory language.
  • No name calling.
  • No personal attacks or put-downs of other blog users.
  • Be patient. Moderator checks and approves new posts several times a day.

Suggest new topics here


Submit candidates for new topics here only. Stay on topic with National Labs' related issues. All submissions are screened first for ...

Monday, August 27, 2012

Officers at Y-12 responded correctly

Anonymously contributed: -------------------------------------------------------------------- Seems like the ProForce officers at Y-12 in fact responded correctly. -------------------------------------------------------------------- Fired Y-12 guard claims he's a scapegoat for embarrassing security breach; says there was no need to rough up peace protesters -- A security police officer said he was fired because he apparently wasn't rough enough with protesters during the July 28 predawn break-in at the Y-12 nuclear weapons plant in Oak Ridge. Fifty-two-year-old Kirk Garland, who has decades of experience at high-security U.S. Department of Energy installations, said he's being used as a scapegoat for an embarrassing breach that was not of his doing...He said he did not pull his gun or take other physical actions immediately because that wasn't necessary. He said he quickly established they were pacifist protesters, in part because of the messages spray-painted on the walls, and they obeyed everything he said.


Anonymous said...

Yea, sure.

mohsin said...

it is nice blogger

Anonymous said...

The officer waited 4 or 5 minutes after reaching the scene to allow the protesters time to pray etc. He stated that he dealt with the protestors according to the "rules of engagement" that were established with previous protesters. All well and good while the protesters are outside of the fence. In this case, having punched through several fences to enter a zone where deadly force was allowed, the protesters had altered those rules of engagement. His gentle attitude was appropriate for an encounter outside, but not at the walls of a building holding SNM. Is he a scapegoat, possibly, but he is not fully innocent either. I am surprised that those in charge of the video camera failures haven't been drawn and quartered. Having a camera to sweep the area that produced the alarms would have gotten the response out before multiple fences were breached.

Anonymous said...

You can tell you've never been anywhere close to being in that situation. You can't just in load on unarmed civilians. That's why no ones ever been killed at y12. For wandering on site or what ever. Bunch of rents cops.

Posts you viewed tbe most last 30 days