Blog purpose
This BLOG is for LLNL present and past employees, friends of LLNL and anyone impacted by the privatization of the Lab to express their opinions and expose the waste, wrongdoing and any kind of injustice against employees and taxpayers by LLNS/DOE/NNSA.
The opinions stated are personal opinions. Therefore,
The BLOG author may or may not agree with them before making the decision to post them.
THIS BLOG WILL NOT POST ANY MAGA PROPAGANDA OR ANY MISINFORMATION REGARDLESS OF SOURCE.
Comments not conforming to BLOG rules are deleted.
Blog author serves as a moderator.
For new topics or suggestions, email jlscoob5@gmail.com
Blog rules
- Stay on topic.
- No profanity, threatening language, pornography.
- NO NAME CALLING.
- No political debate.
- Posts and comments are posted several times a day.
Wednesday, September 12, 2012
DOE was warned - twice - in 2010 about Y-12 security issues.
Anonymously contributed:
============================================================================================
DOE was warned - twice - in 2010 about Y-12 security issues.
How many other safety and security warnings have been ignored by DOE in the past four years?
============================================================================================
http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/security-lapses-at-nuclear-complex-identified-two-years-before-break-in/2012/09/11/7cd3d5fa-fc5e-11e1-a31e-804fccb658f9_story.html?hpid=z4
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Posts you viewed tbe most last 30 days
-
Any regular readers in HR or management got a timeline on coming layoffs?
-
Comments on SUGGEST NEW TOPICS HERE : LLNL - The True Story - From the Santa Fe reporter. I am not convinced that Mello is some kind of ...
-
"Department heads have been asked to justify the roles of the contractors on their team in one-sentence summaries describing why they...
2 comments:
Those warnings must have gotten lost in the rush to send money to Solyndra.
The difference is stunning in how Gates handled the AF nuclear security issue a few years ago. Not only did he quickly hold a large number of high level staff accountable, but he was personally engaged on the issue. He did all this even though the weapons were never out of sight of armed guards, but were not at their correct location.
Chu can't even be bothered to show up for hearings on the NNSA security breach. He sends lower level substitutes in his place. He was personally at all the Solyndra hearings. Actions like who shows up for hearings on what issues say more about Dr. Chu's priorities and attention that all the memos, directives and guidance combined.
Post a Comment