Anonymously contributed:
=========================================================================================
DOE IG report on W76 LEP cost over runs
=========================================================================================
"The National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) is refurbishing the aging W76 nuclear warhead with the goal of extending the warhead life by 30 years. However, the W76 Life Extension Program (LEP) has experienced significant delays in startup and in achieving production goals. NNSA may be unable to complete the W76 LEP within established scope, cost and schedule parameters, unless it adopts a more effective approach to reducing unit costs. This concern is exacerbated by the fact that the Program is faced with a relatively flat budget over the next few years, even though its annual scope of work is projected to increase significantly. The Program's budget increases for Fiscal Years (FY) 2013 and 2014, for example, are projected to be only 2.9 percent in each year more than FY 2011 levels. The Program's production schedule, however, shows production increasing 59 percent during the same period. The increase in production appears to be unsustainable given the projected funding. The goal of reducing the unit cost of W76 LEP production appeared to be one of the only paths to keeping the Program on track without adversely affecting other NNSA programs. Although a senior NNSA official expressed confidence that NNSA would achieve the increased production rates within the out-year budget estimates, Program officials could not provide plans detailing actions necessary to achieve the needed cost reductions. Although Program officials disagreed with our methodology for calculating unit cost, in general, they agreed that our analysis, including the risks going forward, were consistent with NNSA's concerns about Program execution in future years. "
Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises to pursue such stupid ideas as doing Plutonium experiments on NIF. The stupidity arises from the fact that a huge population is placed at risk in the short and long term. Why do this kind of experiment in a heavily populated area? Only a moron would push that kind of imbecile area. Do it somewhere else in the god forsaken hills of Los Alamos. Why should the communities in the Bay Area be subjected to such increased risk just because the lab's NIF has failed twice and is trying the Hail Mary pass of doing an SNM experiment just to justify their existence? Those Laser EoS techniques and the people analyzing the raw data are all just BAD anyways. You know what comes next after they do the experiment. They'll figure out that they need larger samples. More risk for the local population. Stop this imbecilic pursuit. They wan...
Comments
All the LANL Managers (Benner (AD for Weapons) and Owen (W-Division Leader)) responsible for this mess have been promoted by Knapp, including Knapp (PADNW) himself. All these guys are now sucking the tits of the LANS "cash cow"; just what they wanted. Heck'va job guys, heck'va job.....
Oh, well. Let's hope we never need to rely on our nuclear weapons arsenal. We'll get by with the current policy of "pretend and extend" for several more decades if we are lucky.
October 7, 2012 2:51 PM
I recall in a LANL certification meeting someone new to LANL said "what's all the rush trying to meet nuclear weapon delivery schedules, we'll never use these weapons anyway". Spoken by a retired Navy Admiral.....Dr. Pete Nanos.
October 7, 2012 6:50 AM
Well duh! That's why it's a U.S. GOVERNMENT Inspector General report. No teeth, no consequences.
October 8, 2012 9:25 AM
No.
October 8, 2012 9:25 AM
No.
October 8, 2012 8:43 PM
Fact is, we don't know. With all the "bells and whistles" that went on the only way to have demonstrated this was underground. And that didn't happen!
October 13, 2012 6:32 AM
Of course not, you idiot. Would you like the US to return to underground testing? No one in any political party is suggesting that. So to you, all stockpile stewardship projects since 1992 are of unknown benefit? What a troglodyte.