Skip to main content

McMillan receives honor

Image
By scooby
McMillan receives honor Even if it is from a place that no one has ever heard of, it is still an honor. TAKOMA PARK, Md. (Apr. 17) – Charles McMillan, Ph.D., director of the Los Alamos National Laboratory, and president of Los Alamos National Security, LLC (LANS), the company that operates the lab for the National Nuclear Security Administration, was named alumnus of the year by his alma mater, Washington Adventist University during alumni homecoming weekend, April 12-14.

Comments

Anonymous said…
Washington Adventist University

Never heard of it. Is that a Community College?
4/25/2013 3:19 AM
Anonymous said…
It's not Caltech or Stanford or MIT. On the other hand, the guy is smarter and is more accomplished than alot of Caltech/Stanford/MIT arrogant bastard washouts who come to the labs and spend all their time reminding you where they got their PhD while wearing their MIT sweatshirt, showing off those pearly whites, and accomplishing little in life.
4/25/2013 4:05 AM
Anonymous said…
Whoa! Generalize much?
4/25/2013 8:46 AM
Anonymous said…
t's not Caltech or Stanford or MIT. On the other hand, the guy is smarter and is more accomplished than alot of Caltech/Stanford/MIT arrogant bastard washouts who come to the labs and spend all their time reminding you where they got their PhD while wearing their MIT sweatshirt, showing off those pearly whites, and accomplishing little in life.

April 25, 2013 at 4:05 AM

Whhoaa, why didn't you mention The University of California at Berkeley. Your pissing me off buddy.
4/25/2013 6:24 PM
Anonymous said…
What's funny about the Caltech, Stanford, and MIT comment is that McMillan, while attending a Community College getting a sub-BS, spends all his time bragging that he went to MIT, the classes he took there, showing his pearly whites, and not earning the ridiculous salary he commands.
4/25/2013 6:29 PM
Anonymous said…
Washington Adventist University

Is this an accredited school?
4/26/2013 3:40 AM
Anonymous said…
McMillan is a straight-shooter (if you can get anything out of him, of course). Not as well regarded as Hecker. But Hecker was dishonest for trying to create a plutonium "problem" that didn't exist, in order to justify funding for the Modern Pit Facility. Is that what we want? Directors so brazenly dishonest that we transform them into "hero mavericks" in our minds?
4/26/2013 2:37 PM
Anonymous said…
That's called "Munchausen-at-Work" (you can find some Harvard Business Review articles on it), the act of creating problems so that you can come in and fix it in order to gain recognition for the fix (without getting knocked for creating it), when in reality the problem doesn't really exist, or the person created a problem.
4/26/2013 2:40 PM
Anonymous said…
Nobody goes around bragging about how they got their degree at UC Berkeley... except maybe to impress the farmer's daughters or local yokels at the flea market or whatnot.
4/26/2013 3:28 PM
Anonymous said…
Nobody goes around bragging about how they got their degree at UC Berkeley.

April 26, 2013 at 3:28 PM

Nobody goes around bragging WHERE they got their degree(s), if they have any class.
4/26/2013 8:40 PM
Anonymous said…
Adventist University? Really? What did he get, a degree in 7th Day Adventist theology?

Never heard of the place. Of course, it due time both LLNL and LANL will soon have Directors who probably graduated from "Phoenix University".... and with an MBA to boot!
4/26/2013 11:19 PM
Anonymous said…
Nobody goes around bragging about how they got their degree at UC Berkeley.

April 26, 2013 at 3:28 PM

Nobody goes around bragging WHERE they got their degree(s), if they have any class.

April 26, 2013 at 8:40 PM

Is that you Bret Knapp? I understand you could not get into the University of California schools so you settled for the 2nd rate Cal State schools. Cal Poly my ass.
4/27/2013 8:59 AM
Anonymous said…
Knapp has a B.S. in mechanical engineering from California Polytechnic Institute,
and an M.S. in mechanical engineering from the University of California, Davis.

I regard UC Davis as a very good University for engineers.
4/27/2013 11:02 AM
Anonymous said…
I regard UC Davis as a very good University for engineers.

April 27, 2013 at 11:02 AM

"Very good". An adequate term for Bechtel.
4/27/2013 12:48 PM
Anonymous said…
Good enough to be the Principle Associate Director in charge of all nuclear weapons research at Los Alamos?

No, I don't think so. Even worse, Knapp is being carefully groomed to be LANL's next Director as soon as Charlie McMillan finished his 5 year term. What a frightening thought, but not if your into 'dumbed-down' Bechtel style management, I guess.

4/27/2013 4:49 PM
Anonymous said…
No, I don't think so. Even worse, Knapp is being carefully groomed to be LANL's next Director as soon as Charlie McMillan finished his 5 year term. What a frightening thought, but not if your into 'dumbed-down' Bechtel style management, I guess.


April 27, 2013 at 4:49 PM

Sad but true. Thank God I'll be retired before "Igor" takes over.
4/27/2013 7:20 PM
Anonymous said…
McMillan is a straight-shooter (if you can get anything out of him, of course). Not as well regarded as Hecker.

April 26, 2013 at 2:37 PM

To attempt to compare Hecker and McMillan in the same breath is a farce. First, there is no comparison. In terms of speaking Hecker was highly articulate, McMillan is frankly, inarticulate, the man can't speak, uhhh, duhhh, ummm, .....
4/28/2013 11:29 AM
Anonymous said…
I worked personally with both Hecker and McMillan. Sig was educated, erudite, worldly, and well-rounded as a person. He was a true gentleman. McMillan is a bumbling, clueless, in-over-his-head hack who wouldn't look an employee in the eye if his life depended on it.
4/28/2013 7:25 PM
Anonymous said…
Sig was a kind of visionary for the Cold War glory days but today we need a detail oriented technocrat for managing compliance and assurance risks associated with SNM handling related operations. McMillan is neither former nor the latter unfortunately. And yes, it is highly disconcerting to have a lab director so inarticulate and unable to draw logical inferences in deductions on the fly and under pressure. Are you sure he went to MIT?
4/29/2013 12:06 AM
Anonymous said…
Sig Hecker history was a man of scientific vision. The only vision that McMillan has is following the money.
4/29/2013 3:51 AM
Anonymous said…
Hecker has received numerous awards and honors for his accomplishments, from his technical work early in his career to his international efforts currently at Stanford.

McMillan gets an award from some community college that no one has ever heard of, and it makes the news.

The two of them are at different ends of any scale. Hecker is close to the top, and McMillan is at the absolute bottom.
4/29/2013 5:58 AM
Anonymous said…
And future LANL Director Brett Knapp? Scraping the bottom of the spittoon!

Guess he's good enough if all that's required is utter and complete compliance in all things, no matter how minor, so that LANS managers can continue to collect their big, fat bonuses and Congress can continue day dreaming that all is well with the US nuclear weapons research complex.

4/29/2013 9:46 PM
Anonymous said…
Knapp might be exactly what LANL will need for the next 5 years of shrinking budgets and tightening expectations for operations and security. There is nothing better to drive angry employees towards quitting or retiring than to drive around in his flashy sports at and take every weekend in California. He seems to do a great job at pissing off many of you. I think it's intentional.
4/30/2013 12:13 AM
Anonymous said…
It's not intentional. He is dense as a rock, oblivious, doesn't give a shit, and considers being a macho nacho his lifestyle. Just what the US needs to steward its nuclear deterence in the wicked times just over the horizon.
4/30/2013 2:37 PM
Anonymous said…
If the choice comes down to Knapp or Wallace, then the country looses either way. Neither one of them is qualified for the position they now hold and both prove the Peter Principle several times over. Just maybe some other candidates will be seriously considered.
4/30/2013 7:10 PM
Anonymous said…
April 30, 2013 at 7:10 PM

"Looses"?? God, man get an education! How do you expect to be taken seriously?
4/30/2013 10:06 PM
Anonymous said…
The path at LANL to the Director position has been well tread. It's PAD of nuclear weapons and then on to becoming the lab Director. LLNL looks for outsiders but LANL follows this same rigid path of leadership progression.

Given this, you can expect to be hearing the term "Director Knapp" within a few more years, sorry to say.


4/30/2013 11:50 PM
Anonymous said…
Maybe there is a Livermoron in waiting to the top LANL post. Probably not Bruce since he just moved laterally.
5/01/2013 12:33 AM
Anonymous said…
Knapp is the right guy for the job. We need curators for the stockpile. We don't need another hero.
5/01/2013 1:26 PM
Anonymous said…
Knapp is the right guy for the job. We need curators for the stockpile. We don't need another hero.

May 1, 2013 at 1:26 PM

Knapp a "curator"; what a joke! The only thing that Knapp is "curating" is the death and destruction of the LANL weapon program.
5/01/2013 4:59 PM
Anonymous said…
Bruce Tartar should come back from the bone yards and take the helm of the U.S.S. LANL. Richardson is washed up. So tartar should be safe.
5/02/2013 4:37 AM
Anonymous said…
"It's PAD of nuclear weapons and then on to becoming the lab Director. "

Sig was never PADNW. One of our best directors since Bradbury
5/02/2013 10:00 PM
Anonymous said…
Bruce Tartar should come back from the bone yards and take the helm of the U.S.S. LANL. Richardson is washed up. So tartar should be safe.

May 2, 2013 at 4:37 AM

Another "screwed-up" vision of LANL by a Livermoron.
5/03/2013 9:27 AM
Anonymous said…
Yeah LLNL just came in and screwed things up. The halcyon days of Wen-Ho Lee, Intern-laser-eye-damage, lost hard drives, and so on, were completely ruined by LLNL failures. If it weren't for LLNL managers being brought in, we would have had the Modern Pit Facility. But they ruined it for us. They are doing it intentionally - slowly disassembling the nation's first nuclear weapons lab, so that the only thing left standing is the kleptocratic mediocrity called LLNL
5/03/2013 9:46 AM
Anonymous said…
Screw Tartar. Bring in Nuckolls. Nothing better to intimidate LANL people and get them in line than to have their top guy with the name sounding like "knuckles."
5/03/2013 12:09 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Plutonium Shots on NIF.

By scooby
Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises to pursue such stupid ideas as doing Plutonium experiments on NIF. The stupidity arises from the fact that a huge population is placed at risk in the short and long term. Why do this kind of experiment in a heavily populated area? Only a moron would push that kind of imbecile area. Do it somewhere else in the god forsaken hills of Los Alamos. Why should the communities in the Bay Area be subjected to such increased risk just because the lab's NIF has failed twice and is trying the Hail Mary pass of doing an SNM experiment just to justify their existence? Those Laser EoS techniques and the people analyzing the raw data are all just BAD anyways. You know what comes next after they do the experiment. They'll figure out that they need larger samples. More risk for the local population. Stop this imbecilic pursuit. They wan...
155 comments
Read more

Trump is to gut the labs.

By scooby
The budget has a 20% decrease to DOE office of science, 20% cut to NIH. NASA also gets a cut. This will  have a huge negative effect on the lab. Crazy, juts crazy. He also wants to cut NEA and PBS, this may not seem like  a big deal but they get very little money and do great things.
124 comments
Read more

LLNL un-diversity

By scooby
Actual post from Dec. 15 from one of the streams. This is a real topic. As far as promoting women and minorities even if their qualifications are not as good as the white male scientists, I am all for it. We need diversity at the lab and if that is what it takes, so be it.  Quit your whining. Look around the lab, what do you see? White male geezers. How many African Americans do you see at the lab? Virtually none. LLNL is one of the MOST undiverse places you will see. Face it folks, LLNL is an institution of white male privilege and they don't want to give up their privileged positions. California, a state of majority Hispanics has the "crown jewel" LLNL nestled in the middle of it with very FEW Hispanics at all!
79 comments
Read more