Skip to main content

Davis-Bacon Act problem

Image
By scooby
Does anyone have any information on the Davis-Bacon Act problem LLNS is facing?
I heard a rumor it could be big, bigger than the retiree lawsuit.

Comments

Anonymous said…
For those of us unfamiliar with Davis-Bacon (per Wikipedia):

The Davis–Bacon Act of 1931 is a United States federal law that establishes the requirement for paying the local prevailing wages on public works projects. It applies to “contractors and subcontractors performing on federally funded or assisted contracts in excess of $2,000 for the construction, alteration, or repair (including painting and decorating) of public buildings or public works”

Interestingly, it was signed into law by Herbert Hoover.

I have no idea as to the case law that would say this applies to facility construction at national laboratories, but you'd think they would have worked this one out a long time ago.
6/16/2013 8:53 PM
Anonymous said…
Rumor is someone (NNSA, DOE, DOL?) has determined that "all of the LLNL site" is a public works project, and "any" construction, alteration, or repair of lab buildings by lab employees (and labor only subcontractors) is covered by Davis-Bacon. Example, you want a lab electrician to come out an replace a broken light switch in your office - he/she under D-B would get paid by the hour what an outside local electrician is getting in wages to do this same work.

LLNL has never viewed this law as applying to regular day to day lab repair work - just major construction projects done by outside contractors. Lab salaries for workers in these areas is below prevalling local wages - cost to the program for the repaired light switch may seem high due to all the lab taxes on the job, but what the lab employee gets in not the outside wage rate. They many also be owed retroactive pay covering many years of working at the lab. Also workers covered by D-B have to be paid weekly (a big change to lab payroll systems).
6/17/2013 6:06 AM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Trump is to gut the labs.

By scooby
The budget has a 20% decrease to DOE office of science, 20% cut to NIH. NASA also gets a cut. This will  have a huge negative effect on the lab. Crazy, juts crazy. He also wants to cut NEA and PBS, this may not seem like  a big deal but they get very little money and do great things.
124 comments
Read more

Plutonium Shots on NIF.

By scooby
Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises to pursue such stupid ideas as doing Plutonium experiments on NIF. The stupidity arises from the fact that a huge population is placed at risk in the short and long term. Why do this kind of experiment in a heavily populated area? Only a moron would push that kind of imbecile area. Do it somewhere else in the god forsaken hills of Los Alamos. Why should the communities in the Bay Area be subjected to such increased risk just because the lab's NIF has failed twice and is trying the Hail Mary pass of doing an SNM experiment just to justify their existence? Those Laser EoS techniques and the people analyzing the raw data are all just BAD anyways. You know what comes next after they do the experiment. They'll figure out that they need larger samples. More risk for the local population. Stop this imbecilic pursuit. They wan...
155 comments
Read more

Rumor corner

By scooby
LLNS may have excluded the wrong people in last VSSOP? The exclusions were based on outdated job categories and related skills. ULM are now thinking that in the future, job categories and functional areas will have to be re-defined. The next VSSOP/ISP will be based on the new categories and functional areas. The questions I have are: 1) Why didnt they think of that before the transition. It seems like their style is “change things as you go”. Planning is out the window! 2) Who will give input on the new changes? The next RIF apparently is going to be more lucrative than the VSSOP. Depending on the length of employment, a RIFed person, not only gets their 1 week pay per year of service but also from 30 to 120 days notice, essentially 30 to 120 days pay. Please feel free to comment on the rumors or add new ones you actually heard.
92 comments
Read more