LANL subject to another IG report
INSPECTION REPORT: DOE/IG-0889
June 7, 2013
Concerns with Consulting Contract Administration at Various Department Sites
National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) requested that we
conduct a review to determine whether a consulting agreement awarded to
Heather Wilson and Company, LLC (HWC), by Los Alamos National Laboratory
(Los Alamos) was appropriately administered and managed. Specifically,
we were asked to determine whether: (1) work products (deliverables)
were produced in return for monthly payments to HWC of $10,000; (2)
invoices included itemized charges, as required by the agreement; (3)
there was overlap between the services provided and work products
produced by HWC on consulting agreements awarded by Sandia National
Laboratories, Los Alamos, Oak Ridge National Laboratory and the Nevada
National Security Site; and (4) an NNSA Contracting Officer was
subjected to "pressure" when Los Alamos National Security, LLC, the
Management and Operating contractor for Los Alamos, requested
authorization to enter into an agreement with HWC.
identified serious concerns with the administration and management of
agreements with HWC for advice and consultation provided to senior
managers at four Department contractor-operated sites. Specifically,
our testing revealed that the four facility contractors paid
approximately $450,000 to HWC even though they did not receive evidence
that work performed under the agreements had been completed. These
payments were fully reimbursed by the Government.
identified in this report occurred because contractor officials
responsible for crafting and administering the consulting agreements
either did not incorporate, or failed to enforce, the requirements of
the Federal Acquisition Regulation into the agreements with HWC.
Management generally agreed with our findings and recommendations and
indicated it was in the process of implementing or completing corrective
actions. Management indicated that the Department has already
recovered $442,877 from its contractors of the approximately $464,203
paid to HWC, and is reviewing the allowability of the additional
This BLOG is for LLNL present and past employees, friends of LLNL and anyone impacted by the privatization of the Lab to express their opinions and expose the waste, wrongdoing and any kind of injustice against employees and taxpayers by LLNS/DOE/NNSA. The opinions stated are personal opinions. Therefore, The BLOG author may or may not agree with them before making the decision to post them. Comments not conforming to BLOG rules are deleted. Blog author serves as a moderator. For new topics or suggestions, email firstname.lastname@example.org
- ► 2017 (324)
- ► 2016 (295)
- ► 2015 (330)
- ► 2014 (309)
- Safety in natural disasters
- Taking another shot at cutting nukes
- FY14 NNSA Budget: Scarce Resources Devoted to Nucl...
- To Senior Management:
- LLNL Director's update
- Reimagining the National Laboratories
- NNSA Outlines Price Tag Of '3+2' Vision For Future...
- Unemployement benefits for SSVPers
- Cuts to nuclear weapons:
- Mixed Outlook for DOE
- Former Top DOE Intelligence Official to Serve as ‘...
- Lab Employees Opt for Early Retirement
- Davis-Bacon Act problem
- Which Davis?
- Lots of explaining
- NNSA Head computer account hacked!
- Pentagon Could Be Best Place For NNSA Autonomy
- LANL subject to another IG report
- Saving the ozone layer
- Status on furloughs?
- Layoffs Then and Now
- What a waste!
- Lab directors at ORNL
- On another subject: grade retention
- National Ignition Facility faces an uncertain futu...
- Another look at overblown NNSA budgets
- Who is next?
- ▼ June (28)
- ► 2012 (258)
- ► 2011 (162)
- ► 2010 (157)
- ► 2009 (231)
- ► 2008 (374)