Great story on the founding of LLNL.
"Study Recounts Early,
Difficult Years Of Lawrence Livermore National Lab" - The Independent.
Friday, August 23, 2013. By Jeff Garberson
http://www.independentnews.com/news/article_44e876e2-0aad-11e3-a35f-001a4bcf887a.html
I am struck by this, and how its compares today to life at the Lab....
"Guided
by Lawrence’s legacy from the Berkeley Radiation Laboratory, Livermore
staff were young experimentalists who shifted fluidly between groups as
jobs required. They lacked job titles for the most part – even York, who
led the Livermore site, did not receive the title of Director until
Lawrence suggested it offhandedly in 1954.
Most important,
perhaps, Lawrence was always upbeat and looking to the future. He would
not allow gloom or despondency. Even after the third failed nuclear
test, he showed up at the Livermore site and told the young scientists
not to despair but to ask what they could learn from the failures."
Blog purpose
This BLOG is for LLNL present and past employees, friends of LLNL and anyone impacted by the privatization of the Lab to express their opinions and expose the waste, wrongdoing and any kind of injustice against employees and taxpayers by LLNS/DOE/NNSA.
The opinions stated are personal opinions. Therefore,
The BLOG author may or may not agree with them before making the decision to post them.
Comments not conforming to BLOG rules are deleted.
Blog author serves as a moderator.
For new topics or suggestions, email jlscoob5@gmail.com
Blog rules
- Stay on topic.
- No profanity, threatening language, pornography.
- NO NAME CALLING.
- No political debate.
- Posts and comments are posted several times a day.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Posts you viewed tbe most last 30 days
-
So what do the NNSA labs do under the the 2nd Trump administration ? What are the odds we will have a test?
-
Do you remember how hard it was to get a Q clearance? You needed a good reputation, good credit and you couldn't lie about anything. We...
-
The end of LANL and LLNL? "After host Maria Bartiromo questioned whether the two plan to “close down entire agencies,” Ramaswamy said...
7 comments:
So why do we still need both labs?
As long as we're talking fantasies, I'd like to see LLNL go to BES, maybe attached to Berkeley, may not, and placed under UC control. It could function as a west coast Oak Ridge. Part of the lab is already trying to act this way.
What kind of productivity metrics would be enforced? Heads would roll...
However, it would work geographically and probably be more palatable to CA politicians.
LANL has the facilities and means, LLNL has the brains and credibility.
Chose one.
The NIF and D2 EOS fiascos aren't good for LLNL credibility.
Good to see that the Bitter EOS Troll is still with us.
"There's a good story on the founding of LLNL. But I haven't spouted off about EOS in the last hour, so I'll randomly complain about that."
Give us your address and we'll send you a plastic trophy thanking you for your contributions to scientific progress. Maybe that'll fill the void in your life.
Otherwise, get a life.
Give the square mile back to the Navy and site 300 back to the cows.
Be careful what you ask for. It was the Navy that put all the TCE in the ground water.
(And cows make global warming)
Post a Comment