Blog purpose

This BLOG is for LLNL present and past employees, friends of LLNL and anyone impacted by the privatization of the Lab to express their opinions and expose the waste, wrongdoing and any kind of injustice against employees and taxpayers by LLNS/DOE/NNSA. The opinions stated are personal opinions. Therefore, The BLOG author may or may not agree with them before making the decision to post them. Comments not conforming to BLOG rules are deleted. Blog author serves as a moderator. For new topics or suggestions, email jlscoob5@gmail.com

Blog rules

  • Stay on topic.
  • No profanity, threatening language, pornography.
  • NO NAME CALLING.
  • No political debate.
  • Posts and comments are posted several times a day.

Saturday, August 16, 2014

HEAF corrective actions

Has HEAF completed their pledged "corrective actions" to all concerns identified in the September 2013 DOE IG report?

http://energy.gov/sites/prod/files/2013/10/f3/INS-O-13-06.pdf
August 13, 2014 at 11:32 PM 
Anonymous said...
Why do you care? Are you going to get brownie points for telling if they didn't?
August 14, 2014 at 9:56 AM 
Anonymous said...
The "why do you care" topic gatekeeper is making the rounds to earn corporate loyalty brownie points and thats OK. What ever floats their boat.
August 14, 2014 at 10:26 AM 
Anonymous said...
"...Why do you care?..."

According to the DOE IG Report on HEAF, LLNS Management "generally agreed with the report's findings and recommendations". Therefore it is reasonable for an employee of LLNS, a taxpayer, or just a lab neighbor to inquire about LLNS corrective measures. None of whom by the way, require your approval to care. I'm sorry this doesn't meet your expectations. 
By at

2 comments:

Anonymous said...

Quoting the report:

"While our review did not identify any incidents involving loss, misuse, or theft of explosive
materials..."

"In addition, while we did not identify any previous safety issues, ..."

The inspection did find things that could stand to be improved, and management concurred with that.

8/18/2014 9:25 PM
Anonymous said...

Concurred with was a given in the IG report. The corrective actions taken was the topic question .

8/19/2014 7:31 AM

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Posts you viewed tbe most last 30 days

  • NNSA under trump
      So what do the NNSA labs do under the the 2nd Trump administration ? What are the odds we will have a test?
  • The end of LANL and LLNL?
      The end of LANL and LLNL? "After host Maria Bartiromo questioned whether the two plan to “close down entire agencies,” Ramaswamy said...
  • Security clearances
     Do you remember how hard it was to get a Q clearance? You needed a good reputation, good credit and you couldn't lie about anything. We...