Skip to main content

More from POGO on LANL security

More from POGO on LANL security

http://pogoblog.typepad.com/pogo/2012/11/our-nuclear-insecurity-complex.htmlhttp://pogoblog.typepad.com/pogo/2012/11/our-nuclear-insecurity-complex.html

"The situation at Los Alamos is just as troubling. The National Nuclear Security Administration warned the contractor as early as 2010 that a new security project was in danger of being late and over budget. And now, two years later, the agency is demanding that the contractor fully disclose all of the project's problems and show that the nuclear materials stored at the New Mexico facility are safe.

Good idea. But how did the project get this far and so over budget when the agency with oversight power has an office right in Los Alamos that's supposed to oversee the contractor?"
November 14, 2012 4:40 PM
Delete
 

Comments

Anonymous said…
A (reliable, I can assure you) friend tells me that seven (7) years ago -- that's a "7" -- the folks who were preparing to actually *do* the work, you know, the fellows with the tool belts and hard hats, told mgmt that the way the fiber-optic cabling was spec'd wasn't going to work.

Did I mention that this was 7 years ago?

Does it really take that much insight for a manager to sit down with the folks who are actually going to do the work and ask them for the experienced opinions before undertaking multi-hundred-million dollar contracts.

You betchya...

ReFormUC
Anonymous said…
The report reads that the local NNSA office was part of the problem, due to the lax oversight. Perhaps the LANL group had oversight training at Y-12.
Anonymous said…
The path through this series of debacles and failures has become very narrow for the operating contractor. It is becoming progressively more and more difficult to see a way out that does not involve numerous high level personnel changes.
Anonymous said…
Hey POGO are you there ? What do think about using the "Girl on a Tank" as a logo for the fraud waste and abuse at LANL. These guys were trained by SOC, it's time to re-think the entire situation at LANL. This is getting to be a joke, don't ya think?
Anonymous said…
The real question is: Can LANS operate LANL ? If you can answer that then we can proceed to fix the problems.

Popular posts from this blog

Trump is to gut the labs.

The budget has a 20% decrease to DOE office of science, 20% cut to NIH. NASA also gets a cut. This will  have a huge negative effect on the lab. Crazy, juts crazy. He also wants to cut NEA and PBS, this may not seem like  a big deal but they get very little money and do great things.

Plutonium Shots on NIF.

Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises to pursue such stupid ideas as doing Plutonium experiments on NIF. The stupidity arises from the fact that a huge population is placed at risk in the short and long term. Why do this kind of experiment in a heavily populated area? Only a moron would push that kind of imbecile area. Do it somewhere else in the god forsaken hills of Los Alamos. Why should the communities in the Bay Area be subjected to such increased risk just because the lab's NIF has failed twice and is trying the Hail Mary pass of doing an SNM experiment just to justify their existence? Those Laser EoS techniques and the people analyzing the raw data are all just BAD anyways. You know what comes next after they do the experiment. They'll figure out that they need larger samples. More risk for the local population. Stop this imbecilic pursuit. They wan...

Rumor corner

LLNS may have excluded the wrong people in last VSSOP? The exclusions were based on outdated job categories and related skills. ULM are now thinking that in the future, job categories and functional areas will have to be re-defined. The next VSSOP/ISP will be based on the new categories and functional areas. The questions I have are: 1) Why didnt they think of that before the transition. It seems like their style is “change things as you go”. Planning is out the window! 2) Who will give input on the new changes? The next RIF apparently is going to be more lucrative than the VSSOP. Depending on the length of employment, a RIFed person, not only gets their 1 week pay per year of service but also from 30 to 120 days notice, essentially 30 to 120 days pay. Please feel free to comment on the rumors or add new ones you actually heard.